TSTP Solution File: LCL834-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL834-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:34:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 8 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Obeta,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_r____),v_a____),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LLTQSrfVLL/E---3.1_29464.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_apps__preserves__beta_0,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Obeta,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X1,X2,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X3,X2,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Obeta,X1),X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LLTQSrfVLL/E---3.1_29464.p',cls_apps__preserves__beta_0) ).
cnf(cls_beta_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Obeta,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1)),X2)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,X1),X2),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LLTQSrfVLL/E---3.1_29464.p',cls_beta_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Obeta,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_r____),v_a____),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Obeta,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X1,X2,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X3,X2,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Obeta,X1),X3)) ),
cls_apps__preserves__beta_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Obeta,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1)),X2)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,X1),X2),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)))),
cls_beta_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LCL834-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.35 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 13:15:36 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.52 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LLTQSrfVLL/E---3.1_29464.p
% 0.20/0.57 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # new_bool_3 with pid 29542 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.57 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # new_ho_10 with pid 29545 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.20/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.57 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.57 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.57 # Parsed axioms : 472
% 0.20/0.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 301
% 0.20/0.57 # Initial clauses : 171
% 0.20/0.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 171
% 0.20/0.57 # Processed clauses : 248
% 0.20/0.57 # ...of these trivial : 19
% 0.20/0.57 # ...subsumed : 29
% 0.20/0.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 200
% 0.20/0.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.20/0.57 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.20/0.57 # Generated clauses : 68
% 0.20/0.57 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.20/0.57 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Paramodulations : 54
% 0.20/0.57 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Equation resolutions : 14
% 0.20/0.57 # Total rewrite steps : 33
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 68
% 0.20/0.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Negative unit clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 38
% 0.20/0.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 78
% 0.20/0.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 164
% 0.20/0.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 132
% 0.20/0.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2169
% 0.20/0.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1791
% 0.20/0.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.20/0.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 140
% 0.20/0.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 80
% 0.20/0.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 15
% 0.20/0.57 # Condensation attempts : 248
% 0.20/0.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10312
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.57 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.20/0.57 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.57 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.20/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2556 pages
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.57 # User time : 0.049 s
% 0.20/0.57 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.57 # Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.20/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2076 pages
% 0.20/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------