TSTP Solution File: LCL832-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL832-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:33:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 47.57s 47.82s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL832-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 15:51:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34 Mon Jul 4 15:51:51 2022
% 0.12/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27477.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.34 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.34 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.34 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Opreorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|C=B|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A)|C=B.
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|B=C|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,A,tc_nat).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat).
% 0.12/0.34 17 back subsumes 9.
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,29,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(C).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 42 during input processing: 0 [copy,36,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(B).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [copy,37,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [copy,38,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(C).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [copy,42,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 51 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,B,tc_nat)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,A,tc_nat)|B=A.
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____).
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [copy,63,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.34 63 back subsumes 49.
% 0.12/0.34 63 back subsumes 48.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.17/0.42 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.17/0.42 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.17/0.42 number of clauses in intial UL: 45
% 0.17/0.42 number of clauses initially in problem: 70
% 0.17/0.42 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 64
% 0.17/0.42 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.17/0.42 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.17/0.42 absolute distinct symbol count: 30
% 0.17/0.42 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.17/0.42 distinct function count: 9
% 0.17/0.42 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42
% 0.17/0.42 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.18/1.38
% 1.18/1.38
% 1.18/1.38 Changing weight limit from 60 to 35.
% 1.18/1.38
% 1.18/1.38 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 80 givens.
% 1.18/1.38
% 1.66/1.86
% 1.66/1.86
% 1.66/1.86 Changing weight limit from 35 to 26.
% 1.66/1.86
% 1.66/1.86 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 85 givens.
% 1.66/1.86
% 1.97/2.21
% 1.97/2.21
% 1.97/2.21 Changing weight limit from 26 to 23.
% 1.97/2.21
% 1.97/2.21 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 90 givens.
% 1.97/2.21
% 2.22/2.42
% 2.22/2.42
% 2.22/2.42 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 2.22/2.42
% 2.22/2.42 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 95 givens.
% 2.22/2.42
% 2.41/2.60
% 2.41/2.60
% 2.41/2.60 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 2.41/2.60
% 2.41/2.60 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 100 givens.
% 2.41/2.60
% 2.54/2.75
% 2.54/2.75
% 2.54/2.75 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 2.54/2.75
% 2.54/2.75 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 105 givens.
% 2.54/2.75
% 2.76/2.95
% 2.76/2.95
% 2.76/2.95 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 2.76/2.95
% 2.76/2.95 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 115 givens.
% 2.76/2.95
% 3.01/3.24
% 3.01/3.24
% 3.01/3.24 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 3.01/3.24
% 3.01/3.24 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 125 givens.
% 3.01/3.24
% 3.60/3.80
% 3.60/3.80
% 3.60/3.80 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 3.60/3.80
% 3.60/3.80 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 150 givens.
% 3.60/3.80
% 4.20/4.39
% 4.20/4.39
% 4.20/4.39 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 4.20/4.39
% 4.20/4.39 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 180 givens.
% 4.20/4.39
% 4.56/4.75
% 4.56/4.75
% 4.56/4.75 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 4.56/4.75
% 4.56/4.75 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 210 givens.
% 4.56/4.75
% 4.94/5.13
% 4.94/5.13
% 4.94/5.13 Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 4.94/5.13
% 4.94/5.13 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 245 givens.
% 4.94/5.13
% 5.35/5.54
% 5.35/5.54
% 5.35/5.54 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 5.35/5.54
% 5.35/5.54 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 5.35/5.54
% 5.35/5.54
% 5.35/5.54 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 300 givens.
% 5.35/5.54
% 27.58/27.77
% 27.58/27.77
% 27.58/27.77 Changing weight limit from 13 to 14.
% 27.58/27.77
% 27.58/27.77 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 7295 givens.
% 27.58/27.77
% 27.58/27.78
% 27.58/27.78
% 27.58/27.78 Changing weight limit from 14 to 15.
% 27.58/27.78
% 27.58/27.78 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 7300 givens.
% 27.58/27.78
% 27.58/27.79
% 27.58/27.79
% 27.58/27.79 Changing weight limit from 15 to 16.
% 27.58/27.79
% 27.58/27.79 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 7305 givens.
% 27.58/27.79
% 27.58/27.80
% 27.58/27.80
% 27.58/27.80 Changing weight limit from 16 to 17.
% 27.58/27.80
% 27.58/27.80 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 7310 givens.
% 27.58/27.80
% 27.58/27.81
% 27.58/27.81
% 27.58/27.81 Changing weight limit from 17 to 18.
% 27.58/27.81
% 27.58/27.81 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 7315 givens.
% 27.58/27.81
% 32.71/32.92
% 32.71/32.92
% 32.71/32.92 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 32.71/32.92
% 32.71/32.92 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 7715 givens.
% 32.71/32.92
% 33.38/33.61
% 33.38/33.61
% 33.38/33.61 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 33.38/33.61
% 33.38/33.61 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 7745 givens.
% 33.38/33.61
% 34.80/35.02
% 34.80/35.02
% 34.80/35.02 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 34.80/35.02
% 34.80/35.02 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 7975 givens.
% 34.80/35.02
% 47.57/47.81 c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_Osko__Lambda__Xbeta__cases__2__1(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),v_ua______)),c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_ua______))),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A))).
% 47.57/47.81
% 47.57/47.81 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 47.57/47.81 574 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 18329.9 K.
% 47.57/47.81 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 47.57/47.81 sym_ent ( 304) 156 0 156 0 46.3 K
% 47.57/47.81 term ( 32) 123523479 123487754 35725 884 1144.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 rel ( 40) 105853690 105798310 55380 1420 2218.8 K
% 47.57/47.81 term_ptr ( 16) 1640385 1198323 442062 5048 6986.1 K
% 47.57/47.81 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 fpa_head ( 24) 52786 16211 36575 68 858.8 K
% 47.57/47.81 fpa_tree ( 56) 1297534 1297534 0 13337 729.4 K
% 47.57/47.81 context (1288) 15119038 15119038 0 5 6.3 K
% 47.57/47.81 trail ( 24) 34870442 34870442 0 10 0.2 K
% 47.57/47.81 imd_tree ( 32) 89 10 79 0 2.5 K
% 47.57/47.81 imd_pos (4024) 1457775 1457775 0 6 23.6 K
% 47.57/47.81 is_tree ( 24) 88888 46264 42624 198 1003.6 K
% 47.57/47.81 is_pos (2424) 126775877 126775877 0 9 21.3 K
% 47.57/47.81 fsub_pos ( 16) 14379926 14379926 0 1 0.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 literal ( 32) 17730127 17703021 27106 764 870.9 K
% 47.57/47.81 clause ( 88) 5220658 5205601 15057 245 1315.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 47.57/47.81 clash_nd ( 80) 99852 99852 0 3 0.2 K
% 47.57/47.81 clause_ptr ( 16) 45654 30660 14994 245 238.1 K
% 47.57/47.81 int_ptr ( 16) 44553871 44440753 113118 2573 1807.7 K
% 47.57/47.81 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 47.57/47.81 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 47.57/47.81
% 47.57/47.81 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 47.57/47.81
% 47.57/47.81 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 47.57/47.81 forward subsume 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 delete cl time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 keep cl time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 hints time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 print_cl time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 conflict time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 new demod time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 post_process time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 back demod time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 back subsume 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 factor time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 FINDER time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81 unindex time 0.00
% 47.57/47.81
% 47.57/47.81 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 47.57/47.81 1:2 2:29 3:10 4:3 5:3 6:1 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:21
% 47.57/47.81 11:21 12:31 13:31 14:1 15:1 16:1 17:68 18:0 19:0 20:139
% 47.57/47.81 21:2 22:0 23:3 24:2 25:2 26:3 27:2 28:2 29:27 30:10
% 47.57/47.81 31:10 32:14 33:2 34:4 35:26 36:3 37:2 38:2 39:2 40:35
% 47.57/47.81 41:1 42:3 43:2 44:2 45:2 46:7 47:10 48:0 49:0 50:294
% 47.57/47.81 51:38 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:11 56:0 57:0 58:41 59:0 60:0
% 47.57/47.81 61:0 62:0 63:650 64:151 65:449 66:151 67:152 68:0 69:0 70:24
% 47.57/47.81 71:135 72:116 73:116 74:116 75:116 76:116 77:2181 78:80 79:18 80:18
% 47.57/47.81 81:17 82:17 83:30 84:30 85:18 86:32 87:20 88:10 89:8 90:9
% 47.57/47.81 91:9 92:5 93:50 94:9 95:9 96:4 97:4 98:3 99:3
% 47.57/47.81 All others: 126414.
% 47.57/47.81
% 47.57/47.81 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 47.57/47.81
% 47.57/47.81 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------