TSTP Solution File: LCL830-1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : LCL830-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:46:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    8 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   8 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (  11   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f487,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f451,f486]) ).

fof(f486,plain,
    ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_a____),v_u____),v_i____),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f485,f480]) ).

fof(f480,axiom,
    ! [X41,X3,X37,X7,X84,X85] : hAPP(c_COMBC(X7,X84,X37,X41,X3),X85) = hAPP(hAPP(X7,X85),X84),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBC__def_0) ).

fof(f485,plain,
    ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_a____),v_i____),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f484,f480]) ).

fof(f484,plain,
    ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_a____),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f452,f445]) ).

fof(f445,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X36,X37,X30] : c_List_Omap(X36,c_List_Olist_OCons(X2,X30,X37),X37,X3) = c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(X36,X2),c_List_Omap(X36,X30,X37,X3),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_map__eq__Cons__conv_3) ).

fof(f452,axiom,
    ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_OCons(v_a____,v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f451,axiom,
    c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_a____),v_u____),v_i____),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : LCL830-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 02:51:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.47  % (23066)lrs+10_1:1_bd=off:drc=off:lcm=reverse:nwc=5.0:sd=1:sgt=16:spb=goal_then_units:ss=axioms:to=lpo:i=43:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/43Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (23077)dis+1011_3:29_av=off:awrs=decay:awrsf=32:bce=on:drc=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:nwc=2.0:spb=goal_then_units:updr=off:urr=ec_only:i=29:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/29Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)Memory used [KB]: 6268
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (23066)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (23053)Success in time 0.137 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------