TSTP Solution File: LCL830-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : LCL830-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:26:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 4 equ; 1 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_rev__eq__Cons__iff_1,axiom,
c_List_Orev(c_List_Oappend(c_List_Orev(X,Y),c_List_Olist_OCons(Z,c_List_Olist_ONil(Y),Y),Y),Y) = c_List_Olist_OCons(Z,X,Y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_rev__eq__Cons__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_COMBC__def_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_COMBC(X,Y,Z,U,V),W) = hAPP(hAPP(X,W),Y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_COMBC__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_map__eq__Cons__conv_3,axiom,
c_List_Omap(X,c_List_Olist_OCons(Y,Z,U),U,V) = c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(X,Y),c_List_Omap(X,Z,U,V),V),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_map__eq__Cons__conv_3) ).
cnf(405,plain,
c_List_Omap(X,c_List_Olist_OCons(Y,Z,U),U,V) = c_List_Orev(c_List_Oappend(c_List_Orev(c_List_Omap(X,Z,U,V),V),c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(X,Y),c_List_Olist_ONil(V),V),V),V),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_map__eq__Cons__conv_3,cls_rev__eq__Cons__iff_1,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_a____),v_u____),v_i____),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(409,plain,
c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Orev(c_List_Oappend(c_List_Orev(c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_a____),v_u____),v_i____),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_CHAINED_0,cls_rev__eq__Cons__iff_1,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_OCons(v_a____,v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(411,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,409,cls_COMBC__def_0,405,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : LCL830-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 06:36:40 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.51 *
% 0.20/0.51 *
% 0.20/0.51 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.51 *
% 0.20/0.52 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.52 *
% 0.20/0.52 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.52 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.52 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.52 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.52 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.52 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.52 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.52 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.52 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.52 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.52 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.52 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.52 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.52 *
% 0.20/0.52 "."
% 0.20/0.52 *
% 0.20/0.52 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T06:36:40
% 0.20/0.52 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n029.cluster.edu at 2022-07-03T06:36:40
% 0.56/0.78
% 0.56/0.78
% 0.56/0.78 #||
% 0.56/0.78 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.78 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.78 ||#
% 0.56/0.78
% 0.56/0.78 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.56/0.78 ; 510 formulas have been input or derived (from 1 formulas).
% 0.56/0.78 ; 411 (81%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.56/0.78 ; 27 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.56/0.78 ; 384 (93%) are still being kept.
% 0.56/0.78 ;
% 0.56/0.79 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.115 43% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.016 6% Assert (483 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.053 20% Process new row (447 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.007 3% Condensing (283 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.006 2% Forward subsumption (283 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.009 3% Backward subsumption (261 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.001 0% Clause clause subsumption (150 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.017 6% Forward simplification (447 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.004 2% Backward simplification (391 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.003 1% Ordering (386 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.001 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.033 12% Other
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.265 Total
% 0.56/0.79 ; 0.267 Real time
% 0.56/0.79 ;
% 0.56/0.79 ; Term-hash-array has 1,139 terms in all.
% 0.56/0.79 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 257 entries (257 at peak, 261 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.56/0.79 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,203 nodes (1,203 at peak, 1,231 added, 28 deleted).
% 0.56/0.79 ; Retrieved 120 possibly forward subsuming rows in 283 calls.
% 0.56/0.79 ; Retrieved 107 possibly backward subsumed rows in 261 calls.
% 0.56/0.79 ; Path-index has 1,132 entries (1,132 at peak, 1,160 added, 28 deleted).
% 0.56/0.79 ; Path-index has 5,256 nodes (5,256 at peak, 5,309 added, 53 deleted).
% 0.56/0.79 ; Trie-index has 1,132 entries (1,132 at peak, 1,160 added, 28 deleted).
% 0.56/0.79 ; Trie-index has 5,161 nodes (5,161 at peak, 5,274 added, 113 deleted).
% 0.56/0.79 ; Retrieved 341 generalization terms in 1,590 calls.
% 0.56/0.79 ; Retrieved 245 instance terms in 161 calls.
% 0.56/0.79 ;
% 0.56/0.79 ; The agenda of input rows to process has 31 entries:
% 0.56/0.79 ; 31 with value 0
% 0.56/0.79 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 7 entries:
% 0.56/0.79 ; 7 with value 0
% 0.56/0.79 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 383 entries:
% 0.56/0.79 ; 1 with value 4 26 with value 19 4 with value 34
% 0.56/0.79 ; 3 with value 5 10 with value 20 2 with value 35
% 0.56/0.79 ; 4 with value 6 23 with value 21 2 with value 36
% 0.56/0.79 ; 5 with value 7 13 with value 22 2 with value 37
% 0.56/0.79 ; 6 with value 8 8 with value 23 1 with value 38
% 0.56/0.79 ; 9 with value 9 9 with value 24 1 with value 40
% 0.56/0.79 ; 8 with value 10 11 with value 25 2 with value 41
% 0.56/0.79 ; 21 with value 11 10 with value 26 5 with value 43
% 0.56/0.79 ; 25 with value 12 4 with value 27 2 with value 45
% 0.56/0.79 ; 12 with value 13 11 with value 28 2 with value 47
% 0.56/0.79 ; 21 with value 14 2 with value 29 1 with value 48
% 0.56/0.79 ; 30 with value 15 7 with value 30 2 with value 49
% 0.56/0.79 ; 16 with value 16 1 with value 31 2 with value 50
% 0.56/0.79 ; 17 with value 17 5 with value 32 1 with value 77
% 0.56/0.79 ; 28 with value 18 8 with value 33
% 0.56/0.79 Evaluation took:
% 0.56/0.79 0.269 seconds of real time
% 0.56/0.79 0.251499 seconds of user run time
% 0.56/0.79 0.016877 seconds of system run time
% 0.56/0.79 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.56/0.79 0 page faults and
% 0.56/0.79 12,073,792 bytes consed.
% 0.56/0.79 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.79 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T06:36:41
% 0.56/0.79 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.79 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------