TSTP Solution File: LCL828-1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : LCL828-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 07:42:48 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   6 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   9   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   32 (  32 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   1   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   8 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   5   !;   0   ?;   6   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_12,type,
    sQ0_eqProxy: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).

tff(f92,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f91,f63]) ).

tff(f63,axiom,
    c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tYvcPtGlMb/Vampire---4.8_15955',cls_uIT_0) ).

tff(f91,plain,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f90,f68]) ).

tff(f68,axiom,
    c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tYvcPtGlMb/Vampire---4.8_15955',cls_CHAINED_0_03) ).

tff(f90,plain,
    ( ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____)
    | ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f89,f69]) ).

tff(f69,axiom,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tYvcPtGlMb/Vampire---4.8_15955',cls_conjecture_0) ).

tff(f89,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,X0,v_i____))
      | ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,X0,v_T____)
      | ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f66,f65]) ).

tff(f65,axiom,
    c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,v_Ua____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tYvcPtGlMb/Vampire---4.8_15955',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

tff(f66,axiom,
    ! [X26: $i,X24: $i,X25: $i,X23: $i] :
      ( ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X25,X24,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,X26)
      | ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X23)
      | ~ c_Type_Otyping(X25,X23,v_T____)
      | c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,X23,X24)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tYvcPtGlMb/Vampire---4.8_15955',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : LCL828-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 13:54:46 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tYvcPtGlMb/Vampire---4.8_15955
% 0.54/0.74  % (16226)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (16223)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (16221)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (16222)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (16220)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (16224)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (16225)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.54/0.74  % (16226)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16226)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74  % (16226)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.74  % (16226)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.74  
% 0.54/0.74  % (16226)Memory used [KB]: 1038
% 0.54/0.74  % (16226)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.54/0.74  % (16226)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.54/0.74  % (16226)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74  % (16226)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (16225)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16225)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (16225)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.75  % (16225)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % (16225)Memory used [KB]: 969
% 0.54/0.75  % (16225)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.54/0.75  % (16225)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.75  % (16220)First to succeed.
% 0.54/0.75  % (16224)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16224)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (16224)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.75  % (16225)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (16225)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (16224)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % (16224)Memory used [KB]: 1045
% 0.54/0.75  % (16224)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.54/0.75  % (16224)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.54/0.75  % (16220)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-16216"
% 0.54/0.75  % (16224)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (16224)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.75  % (16220)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.59/0.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for Vampire---4
% 0.59/0.75  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.75  % (16220)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.75  % (16220)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.59/0.75  % (16220)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.59/0.75  
% 0.59/0.75  % (16220)Memory used [KB]: 1058
% 0.59/0.75  % (16220)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.59/0.75  % (16220)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.59/0.75  % (16216)Success in time 0.378 s
% 0.59/0.75  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------