TSTP Solution File: LCL828-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : LCL828-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:49:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.30s 2.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 35
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 43 ( 9 unt; 30 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 34 ( 20 >; 14 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 10 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 (; 9 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_Type_Otyping > c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless > c_Lambda_Obeta > class_Ring__and__Field_Osemiring__1 > class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__semidom > class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom > class_Orderings_Opreorder > class_Orderings_Oorder > class_Orderings_Olinorder > class_Nat_Osemiring__char__0 > c_InductTermi_OIT > c_Type_Oshift > c_Lambda_Osubst > c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat > c_Lambda_Osko__Lambda__Xbeta__cases__2__1 > c_Lambda_Olift > c_Lambda_OdB_OApp > #nlpp > c_Lambda_OdB_OVar > c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs > c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero > v_ua______ > v_u____ > v_n____ > v_i____ > v_e____ > v_a____ > v_Ua____ > v_T____ > tc_nat > tc_Type_Otype
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(c_Lambda_Olift,type,
c_Lambda_Olift: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(class_Orderings_Olinorder,type,
class_Orderings_Olinorder: $i > $o ).
tff(c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless,type,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(tc_Type_Otype,type,
tc_Type_Otype: $i ).
tff(c_InductTermi_OIT,type,
c_InductTermi_OIT: $i > $o ).
tff(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat,type,
c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_Lambda_Obeta,type,
c_Lambda_Obeta: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(class_Orderings_Oorder,type,
class_Orderings_Oorder: $i > $o ).
tff(class_Orderings_Opreorder,type,
class_Orderings_Opreorder: $i > $o ).
tff(c_Lambda_Osubst,type,
c_Lambda_Osubst: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_Ua____,type,
v_Ua____: $i ).
tff(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,type,
c_Lambda_OdB_OApp: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_ua______,type,
v_ua______: $i ).
tff(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar,type,
c_Lambda_OdB_OVar: $i > $i ).
tff(c_Type_Oshift,type,
c_Type_Oshift: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_n____,type,
v_n____: $i ).
tff(c_Type_Otyping,type,
c_Type_Otyping: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(v_e____,type,
v_e____: $i ).
tff(class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom,type,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom: $i > $o ).
tff(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs,type,
c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs: $i > $i ).
tff(tc_nat,type,
tc_nat: $i ).
tff(class_Nat_Osemiring__char__0,type,
class_Nat_Osemiring__char__0: $i > $o ).
tff(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero,type,
c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero: $i > $i ).
tff(c_Lambda_Osko__Lambda__Xbeta__cases__2__1,type,
c_Lambda_Osko__Lambda__Xbeta__cases__2__1: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_T____,type,
v_T____: $i ).
tff(v_i____,type,
v_i____: $i ).
tff(v_a____,type,
v_a____: $i ).
tff(v_u____,type,
v_u____: $i ).
tff(class_Ring__and__Field_Osemiring__1,type,
class_Ring__and__Field_Osemiring__1: $i > $o ).
tff(class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__semidom,type,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__semidom: $i > $o ).
tff(f_371,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_370,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_358,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,v_Ua____),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_369,axiom,
! [V_ua,V_ia,V_ea,V_T_H] :
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,V_ua,V_ia))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(V_ea,V_ua,v_T____)
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(V_ua)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(V_ea,V_ia,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,V_T_H) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_373,axiom,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_136,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_371]) ).
tff(c_134,plain,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_370]) ).
tff(c_130,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,v_Ua____),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_358]) ).
tff(c_1693,plain,
! [V_ea_378,V_ia_379,V_T_H_380,V_ua_381] :
( ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(V_ea_378,V_ia_379,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,V_T_H_380)
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(V_ua_381)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(V_ea_378,V_ua_381,v_T____)
| c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,V_ua_381,V_ia_379)) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_369]) ).
tff(c_1745,plain,
! [V_ua_408] :
( ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(V_ua_408)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,V_ua_408,v_T____)
| c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,V_ua_408,v_i____)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_1693]) ).
tff(c_138,plain,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_373]) ).
tff(c_1748,plain,
( ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1745,c_138]) ).
tff(c_1752,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_136,c_134,c_1748]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : LCL828-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 14:18:22 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 5.30/2.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.30/2.24
% 5.30/2.24 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.30/2.26
% 5.30/2.26 Inference rules
% 5.30/2.26 ----------------------
% 5.30/2.26 #Ref : 6
% 5.30/2.26 #Sup : 336
% 5.30/2.26 #Fact : 6
% 5.30/2.26 #Define : 0
% 5.30/2.26 #Split : 0
% 5.30/2.26 #Chain : 0
% 5.30/2.26 #Close : 0
% 5.30/2.26
% 5.30/2.26 Ordering : KBO
% 5.30/2.26
% 5.30/2.26 Simplification rules
% 5.30/2.26 ----------------------
% 5.30/2.26 #Subsume : 110
% 5.30/2.26 #Demod : 109
% 5.30/2.26 #Tautology : 96
% 5.30/2.26 #SimpNegUnit : 24
% 5.30/2.26 #BackRed : 0
% 5.30/2.26
% 5.30/2.26 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.30/2.26 #Strategies tried : 1
% 5.30/2.26
% 5.30/2.26 Timing (in seconds)
% 5.30/2.26 ----------------------
% 5.30/2.26 Preprocessing : 0.60
% 5.30/2.26 Parsing : 0.31
% 5.30/2.26 CNF conversion : 0.04
% 5.30/2.26 Main loop : 0.61
% 5.30/2.26 Inferencing : 0.23
% 5.30/2.26 Reduction : 0.18
% 5.30/2.26 Demodulation : 0.12
% 5.30/2.27 BG Simplification : 0.04
% 5.30/2.27 Subsumption : 0.12
% 5.30/2.27 Abstraction : 0.03
% 5.30/2.27 MUC search : 0.00
% 5.30/2.27 Cooper : 0.00
% 5.30/2.27 Total : 1.25
% 5.30/2.27 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 5.30/2.27 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 5.30/2.27 Index Matching : 0.00
% 5.30/2.27 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------