TSTP Solution File: LCL821-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : LCL821-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:26:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.85s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_list__app__typeE_1,axiom,
( c_Type_Otypings(X,Y,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeE__1__1(Z,X,U,Y))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,U,Y,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_list__app__typeE_1) ).
cnf(cls_nT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____),v_rs____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_T_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_nT_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( v_thesis____
| ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_rs____,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(274,plain,
~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_rs____,X),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(831,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_list__app__typeE_1,274,cls_nT_0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL821-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 2 17:42:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.47 *
% 0.18/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.47 *
% 0.18/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.47 *
% 0.18/0.47 "."
% 0.18/0.47 *
% 0.18/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T17:42:47
% 0.18/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-07-02T17:42:47
% 0.18/0.56
% 0.18/0.56 ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.18/0.57 WARNING:
% 0.18/0.57 |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.57 WARNING:
% 0.18/0.57 |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.57 WARNING:
% 0.18/0.57 |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.57 WARNING:
% 0.18/0.57 |class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.57 WARNING:
% 0.18/0.57 |class_Int_Onumber__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.57 WARNING:
% 0.18/0.57 |class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.57 WARNING:
% 0.18/0.57 |class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.61/0.85 ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.61/0.85
% 0.61/0.85 #||
% 0.61/0.85 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.85 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.85 ||#
% 0.61/0.85
% 0.61/0.85 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.61/0.85 ; 2444 formulas have been input or derived (from 170 formulas).
% 0.61/0.85 ; 831 (34%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.61/0.85 ; 55 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.61/0.85 ; 776 (93%) are still being kept.
% 0.61/0.85 ;
% 0.61/0.85 ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.080 21% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.012 3% Assert (367 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.066 17% Process new row (2,036 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.042 11% Resolution (338 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.016 4% Paramodulation (169 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (5 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.021 6% Condensing (754 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.033 9% Forward subsumption (754 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.010 3% Backward subsumption (400 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.009 2% Clause clause subsumption (1,467 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.040 10% Forward simplification (2,006 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.014 4% Backward simplification (814 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.007 2% Ordering (3,096 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.001 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.030 8% Other
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.381 Total
% 0.61/0.85 ; 0.382 Real time
% 0.61/0.85 ;
% 0.61/0.85 ; Term-hash-array has 1,750 terms in all.
% 0.61/0.85 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 392 entries (392 at peak, 400 added, 8 deleted).
% 0.61/0.85 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,633 nodes (2,633 at peak, 2,714 added, 81 deleted).
% 0.61/0.85 ; Retrieved 1,981 possibly forward subsuming rows in 754 calls.
% 0.61/0.85 ; Retrieved 153 possibly backward subsumed rows in 400 calls.
% 0.61/0.85 ; Path-index has 1,700 entries (1,700 at peak, 1,777 added, 77 deleted).
% 0.61/0.85 ; Path-index has 3,935 nodes (3,935 at peak, 4,022 added, 87 deleted).
% 0.61/0.85 ; Trie-index has 1,700 entries (1,700 at peak, 1,777 added, 77 deleted).
% 0.61/0.85 ; Trie-index has 6,630 nodes (6,630 at peak, 6,941 added, 311 deleted).
% 0.61/0.85 ; Retrieved 5,619 generalization terms in 9,728 calls.
% 0.61/0.85 ; Retrieved 751 instance terms in 478 calls.
% 0.61/0.85 ; Retrieved 35,314 unifiable terms in 1,626 calls.
% 0.61/0.85 ;
% 0.61/0.85 ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.61/0.85 ; 1 with value 16 1 with value 19 4 with value 21
% 0.61/0.85 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 98 entries:
% 0.61/0.85 ; 3 with value 21 4 with value 29 1 with value 40
% 0.61/0.85 ; 10 with value 22 3 with value 30 2 with value 41
% 0.61/0.85 ; 9 with value 23 5 with value 31 1 with value 42
% 0.61/0.85 ; 10 with value 24 6 with value 32 2 with value 47
% 0.61/0.85 ; 7 with value 25 2 with value 33 1 with value 48
% 0.61/0.85 ; 8 with value 26 1 with value 34 3 with value 52
% 0.61/0.85 ; 8 with value 27 1 with value 35 1 with value 53
% 0.61/0.85 ; 10 with value 28
% 0.61/0.85 ; The agenda of rows to give has 508 entries:
% 0.61/0.85 ; 2 with value (4 6) 13 with value (4 17) 21 with value (4 28)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 2 with value (4 7) 32 with value (4 18) 23 with value (4 29)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 7 with value (4 8) 20 with value (4 19) 16 with value (4 30)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 8 with value (4 9) 23 with value (4 20) 13 with value (4 31)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 6 with value (4 10) 34 with value (4 21) 8 with value (4 32)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 12 with value (4 11) 40 with value (4 22) 3 with value (4 33)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 6 with value (4 12) 37 with value (4 23) 2 with value (4 34)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 15 with value (4 13) 25 with value (4 24) 2 with value (4 35)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 10 with value (4 14) 27 with value (4 25) 6 with value (4 36)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 29 with value (4 15) 25 with value (4 26) 4 with value (4 37)
% 0.61/0.86 ; 24 with value (4 16) 8 with value (4 27) 5 with value (4 38)
% 0.61/0.86 Evaluation took:
% 0.61/0.86 0.392 seconds of real time
% 0.61/0.86 0.356926 seconds of user run time
% 0.61/0.86 0.03409 seconds of system run time
% 0.61/0.86 [Run times include 0.019 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.61/0.86 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.61/0.86 0 page faults and
% 0.61/0.86 24,992,416 bytes consed.
% 0.61/0.86 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.86 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T17:42:48
% 0.61/0.86 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.86 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------