TSTP Solution File: LCL821-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL821-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:33:58 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
( v_thesis____
| ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_rs____,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZieESO2MCI/E---3.1_25808.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZieESO2MCI/E---3.1_25808.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_list__app__typeE_1,axiom,
( c_Type_Otypings(X1,X2,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeE__1__1(X3,X1,X4,X2))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X4,X2,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZieESO2MCI/E---3.1_25808.p',cls_list__app__typeE_1) ).
cnf(cls_nT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____),v_rs____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_T_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZieESO2MCI/E---3.1_25808.p',cls_nT_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( v_thesis____
| ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_rs____,X1) ),
cls_that_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_rs____,X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_Type_Otypings(X1,X2,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeE__1__1(X3,X1,X4,X2))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X4,X2,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X3) ),
cls_list__app__typeE_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____),v_rs____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_T_H____),
cls_nT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X1,v_rs____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : LCL821-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:45:05 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZieESO2MCI/E---3.1_25808.p
% 0.15/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 25885 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 25893 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.48
% 0.15/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.48 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 367
% 0.15/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Initial clauses : 367
% 0.15/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.15/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 365
% 0.15/0.48 # Processed clauses : 620
% 0.15/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 27
% 0.15/0.48 # ...subsumed : 120
% 0.15/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 473
% 0.15/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 0.15/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.15/0.48 # Generated clauses : 520
% 0.15/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 383
% 0.15/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Paramodulations : 494
% 0.15/0.48 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.15/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 23
% 0.15/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 256
% 0.15/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 188
% 0.15/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 50
% 0.15/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.15/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 23
% 0.15/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 114
% 0.15/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 410
% 0.15/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 921
% 0.15/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 287
% 0.15/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6264
% 0.15/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4895
% 0.15/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 54
% 0.15/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 295
% 0.15/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 120
% 0.15/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 42
% 0.15/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 19748
% 0.15/0.48
% 0.15/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.48 # User time : 0.041 s
% 0.15/0.48 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.48 # Total time : 0.044 s
% 0.15/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 2408 pages
% 0.15/0.48
% 0.15/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.48 # User time : 0.197 s
% 0.15/0.48 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.48 # Total time : 0.204 s
% 0.15/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1960 pages
% 0.15/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------