TSTP Solution File: LCL817-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL817-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:26:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    1
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    7 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_uT_0,axiom,
    c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_uT_0) ).

cnf(cls_argT_0,axiom,
    c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,v_T_H_H____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_argT_0) ).

cnf(cls_subst__lemma_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_Type_Otyping(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X,U,Z,tc_Type_Otype),V,W)
    | c_Type_Otyping(X,c_Lambda_Osubst(V,Y,U),W) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subst__lemma_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____),v_T_H_H____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(824,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_subst__lemma_0,cls_uT_0,cls_argT_0,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL817-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.18/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 17:05:11 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44  * 
% 0.18/0.44  * 
% 0.18/0.45  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.45   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.45   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  "."
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-04T17:05:11
% 0.18/0.45  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n025.cluster.edu at 2022-07-04T17:05:11
% 0.18/0.53  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.53     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.53  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.53     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.53  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.53     |class_Int_Onumber__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.53  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.53     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.53  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.53     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.52/0.75  
% 0.52/0.75  
% 0.52/0.75  #||
% 0.52/0.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.52/0.75  ||#
% 0.52/0.75  
% 0.52/0.75  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.52/0.75  ;      1677 formulas have been input or derived (from 164 formulas).
% 0.52/0.75  ;       824 (49%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.52/0.75  ;           14 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.52/0.75  ;          810 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.52/0.75  ; 
% 0.52/0.75  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.065  22%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.009   3%   Assert                       (294 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.071  24%   Process new row              (1,425 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.021   7%   Resolution                   (326 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.006   2%   Paramodulation               (163 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.010   3%   Condensing                   (386 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.008   3%   Forward subsumption          (386 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.005   2%   Backward subsumption         (271 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.005   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (447 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.045  15%   Forward simplification       (1,404 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.013   4%   Backward simplification      (822 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.015   5%   Ordering                     (2,588 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.026   9%   Other
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.300        Total
% 0.52/0.75  ;     0.300        Real time
% 0.52/0.75  ; 
% 0.52/0.75  ; Term-hash-array has 2,295 terms in all.
% 0.52/0.75  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 270 entries (270 at peak, 271 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.52/0.75  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,870 nodes (1,870 at peak, 1,896 added, 26 deleted).
% 0.52/0.75  ;  Retrieved 569 possibly forward subsuming rows in 386 calls.
% 0.52/0.75  ;  Retrieved 78 possibly backward subsumed rows in 271 calls.
% 0.52/0.75  ; Path-index has 2,292 entries (2,292 at peak, 2,327 added, 35 deleted).
% 0.52/0.75  ; Path-index has 4,739 nodes (4,739 at peak, 4,792 added, 53 deleted).
% 0.52/0.75  ; Trie-index has 2,292 entries (2,292 at peak, 2,327 added, 35 deleted).
% 0.52/0.75  ; Trie-index has 10,218 nodes (10,218 at peak, 10,421 added, 203 deleted).
% 0.52/0.75  ; Retrieved 2,546 generalization terms in 5,971 calls.
% 0.52/0.75  ; Retrieved 796 instance terms in 635 calls.
% 0.52/0.75  ; Retrieved 25,055 unifiable terms in 1,767 calls.
% 0.52/0.75  ; 
% 0.52/0.75  ; The agenda of rows to process has 19 entries:
% 0.52/0.75  ;     1 with value 6               8 with value 18               1 with value 27
% 0.52/0.75  ;     1 with value 10              1 with value 22               4 with value 33
% 0.52/0.75  ;     1 with value 11              1 with value 23               1 with value 38
% 0.52/0.75  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 65 entries:
% 0.52/0.75  ;     4 with value 25              6 with value 31               2 with value 42
% 0.52/0.75  ;     9 with value 26              5 with value 32               1 with value 44
% 0.52/0.75  ;     7 with value 27              6 with value 33               1 with value 45
% 0.52/0.75  ;     9 with value 28              1 with value 34               3 with value 47
% 0.52/0.75  ;     2 with value 29              2 with value 36               1 with value 51
% 0.52/0.75  ;     4 with value 30              1 with value 38               1 with value 52
% 0.52/0.75  ; The agenda of rows to give has 583 entries:
% 0.52/0.75  ;     1 with value (4 5)          19 with value (4 18)          31 with value (4 30)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     1 with value (4 6)          24 with value (4 19)          25 with value (4 31)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     5 with value (4 7)          21 with value (4 20)          31 with value (4 32)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     2 with value (4 9)          33 with value (4 21)          43 with value (4 33)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     4 with value (4 10)         32 with value (4 22)           9 with value (4 34)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     7 with value (4 11)         41 with value (4 23)           4 with value (4 35)
% 0.52/0.75  ;     4 with value (4 12)         37 with value (4 24)           4 with value (4 36)
% 0.52/0.75  ;    12 with value (4 13)         38 with value (4 25)           4 with value (4 37)
% 0.52/0.75  ;    13 with value (4 14)         38 with value (4 26)           2 with value (4 38)
% 0.52/0.75  ;    18 with value (4 15)          9 with value (4 27)           4 with value (4 39)
% 0.52/0.75  ;    16 with value (4 16)          9 with value (4 28)          13 with value (4 40)
% 0.52/0.75  ;    12 with value (4 17)         16 with value (4 29)           1 with value (4 41)
% 0.52/0.75  Evaluation took:
% 0.52/0.75    0.301 seconds of real time
% 0.52/0.75    0.280293 seconds of user run time
% 0.52/0.75    0.020782 seconds of system run time
% 0.52/0.75    [Run times include 0.01 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.52/0.75    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.52/0.75    0 page faults and
% 0.52/0.75    19,678,888 bytes consed.
% 0.52/0.75  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.52/0.75  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-04T17:05:12
% 0.52/0.75  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.52/0.75  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------