TSTP Solution File: LCL817-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL817-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:21:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_subst__lemma_0,axiom,
( c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_Osubst(X5,X2,X4),X6)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X4,X3,tc_Type_Otype),X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wsVW7S28mM/E---3.1_1163.p',cls_subst__lemma_0) ).
cnf(cls_argT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,v_T_H_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wsVW7S28mM/E---3.1_1163.p',cls_argT_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____),v_T_H_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wsVW7S28mM/E---3.1_1163.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_uT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wsVW7S28mM/E---3.1_1163.p',cls_uT_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_Osubst(X5,X2,X4),X6)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X4,X3,tc_Type_Otype),X5,X6) ),
cls_subst__lemma_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,v_T_H_H____),
cls_argT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____),v_T_H_H____),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,X1,v_i____),v_T_H_H____)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,X1,v_T____) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
cls_uT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.14 % Problem : LCL817-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 13:03:28 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wsVW7S28mM/E---3.1_1163.p
% 0.23/0.57 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # new_bool_3 with pid 1309 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.57 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.57 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1314 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.23/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.57 # Search class: FGUSM-FFLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.57 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.57 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.57
% 0.23/0.57 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.57 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.57 # Parsed axioms : 294
% 0.23/0.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 155
% 0.23/0.57 # Initial clauses : 139
% 0.23/0.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 139
% 0.23/0.57 # Processed clauses : 145
% 0.23/0.57 # ...of these trivial : 23
% 0.23/0.57 # ...subsumed : 18
% 0.23/0.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 104
% 0.23/0.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.23/0.57 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.23/0.57 # Generated clauses : 328
% 0.23/0.57 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 261
% 0.23/0.57 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Paramodulations : 309
% 0.23/0.57 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.23/0.57 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Equation resolutions : 17
% 0.23/0.57 # Total rewrite steps : 105
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 100
% 0.23/0.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.23/0.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.23/0.57 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.23/0.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 62
% 0.23/0.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 255
% 0.23/0.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 571
% 0.23/0.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1077
% 0.23/0.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 778
% 0.23/0.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10
% 0.23/0.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.23/0.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 51
% 0.23/0.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.23/0.57 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9687
% 0.23/0.57
% 0.23/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.57 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/0.57 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.57 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.23/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2180 pages
% 0.23/0.57
% 0.23/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.57 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.23/0.57 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.57 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.23/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 1920 pages
% 0.23/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------