TSTP Solution File: LCL817-1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : LCL817-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:59:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 80
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 86 ( 7 unt; 76 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 7 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 110 ( 53 >; 57 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 29 ( 28 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 48 ( 48 usr; 23 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
c_List_Oappend: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
c_List_Olist_ONil: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
c_List_Olist_OCons: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
c_List_Olistsp: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_26,type,
c_ListOrder_Ostep1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
hAPP: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
hBOOL: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_29,type,
c_List_Ofoldr: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
c_Type_Osko__Type__Xtypes__snocE__1__2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
c_Type_Otyping: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_32,type,
tc_Lambda_OdB: $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
c_Type_Otypings: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_34,type,
c_List_Ofoldl: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_36,type,
c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_37,type,
c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_38,type,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_39,type,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_40,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_41,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_42,type,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_43,type,
class_Int_Onumber__ring: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_44,type,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__semidom: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_45,type,
c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_46,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Ocancel__semigroup__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_47,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Ocancel__ab__semigroup__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_48,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__comm__monoid__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_49,type,
class_Ring__and__Field_Osemiring__1: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_50,type,
tc_nat: $i ).
tff(decl_51,type,
c_Predicate_Oconversep: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_52,type,
c_Transitive__Closure_Ortranclp: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_53,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_54,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_55,type,
c_InductTermi_OIT: $i ).
tff(decl_56,type,
v_ua______: $i ).
tff(decl_57,type,
c_Wellfounded_Oaccp: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_58,type,
c_Lambda_Obeta: $i ).
tff(decl_59,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_60,type,
class_Nat_Osemiring__char__0: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_61,type,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_62,type,
c_Lambda_OdB_OApp: $i ).
tff(decl_63,type,
c_fequal: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_64,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__cancel__ab__semigroup__add: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_65,type,
class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_66,type,
class_Orderings_Opreorder: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_67,type,
class_Orderings_Olinorder: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_68,type,
class_Orderings_Oorder: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_69,type,
c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_70,type,
c_Lambda_OdB_OVar: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_71,type,
c_Type_Osko__Type__Xvar__app__typesE__1__1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_72,type,
c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_73,type,
c_Type_Oshift: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_74,type,
c_Lambda_Osubst: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_75,type,
v_ea______: $i ).
tff(decl_76,type,
v_T____: $i ).
tff(decl_77,type,
c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeE__1__1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_78,type,
c_Type_Osko__Type__Xvar__app__types__1__1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_79,type,
v_rs____: $i ).
tff(decl_80,type,
v_a____: $i ).
tff(decl_81,type,
v_as____: $i ).
tff(decl_82,type,
c_ListBeta_Osko__ListBeta__Xhead__Var__reduction__1__1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_83,type,
c_Type_Otype_OFun: $i ).
tff(decl_84,type,
c_Type_Osko__Type__Xtyping__elims__2__1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_85,type,
tc_Type_Otype: $i ).
tff(decl_86,type,
c_Lambda_Olift: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_87,type,
v_T_H_H____: $i ).
tff(decl_88,type,
v_Ts____: $i ).
tff(decl_89,type,
v_T_H____: $i ).
tff(decl_90,type,
v_e____: $i ).
tff(decl_91,type,
v_i____: $i ).
tff(decl_92,type,
v_n____: $i ).
tff(decl_93,type,
v_ia______: $i ).
tff(decl_94,type,
v_T_Ha______: $i ).
tff(decl_95,type,
v_u____: $i ).
tff(decl_96,type,
tc_fun: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_97,type,
tc_bool: $i ).
cnf(cls_subst__lemma_0,axiom,
( c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_Osubst(X5,X2,X4),X6)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X4,X3,tc_Type_Otype),X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subst__lemma_0) ).
cnf(cls_argT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,v_T_H_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_argT_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____),v_T_H_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_uT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_uT_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_Osubst(X5,X2,X4),X6)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X4,X3,tc_Type_Otype),X5,X6) ),
cls_subst__lemma_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,v_T_H_H____),
cls_argT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,v_u____,v_i____),v_T_H_H____),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,c_Lambda_Osubst(v_a____,X1,v_i____),v_T_H_H____)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,X1,v_T____) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
cls_uT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : LCL817-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 06:23:27 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.47 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.51 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.13/0.51 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.51 % Proof found
% 0.13/0.51 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.51 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.51 % Total time : 0.029000 s
% 0.13/0.51 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.13/0.51 % Total time : 0.036000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------