TSTP Solution File: LCL815-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL815-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:21:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 12 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8tsz0YfLi0/E---3.1_6021.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_lift__types_0,axiom,
( c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),X2),X4,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X5)
| ~ c_Type_Otypings(X1,X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8tsz0YfLi0/E---3.1_6021.p',cls_lift__types_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8tsz0YfLi0/E---3.1_6021.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),X2),X4,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X5)
| ~ c_Type_Otypings(X1,X4,X5) ),
cls_lift__types_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.19 % Problem : LCL815-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.20 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.20/0.41 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.20/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.41 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:21:57 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/0.61 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.61 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8tsz0YfLi0/E---3.1_6021.p
% 0.26/0.71 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.26/0.71 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # sh5l with pid 6102 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.26/0.71 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.71 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.71 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 6106 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.26/0.71 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.71 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.71 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.71 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.035 s
% 0.26/0.71
% 0.26/0.71 # Proof found!
% 0.26/0.71 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.71 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.71 # Parsed axioms : 817
% 0.26/0.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 93
% 0.26/0.71 # Initial clauses : 724
% 0.26/0.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 724
% 0.26/0.71 # Processed clauses : 346
% 0.26/0.71 # ...of these trivial : 23
% 0.26/0.71 # ...subsumed : 64
% 0.26/0.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 259
% 0.26/0.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.26/0.71 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.26/0.71 # Generated clauses : 869
% 0.26/0.71 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 685
% 0.26/0.71 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Paramodulations : 842
% 0.26/0.71 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.26/0.71 # NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Equation resolutions : 23
% 0.26/0.71 # Total rewrite steps : 435
% 0.26/0.71 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.71 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.71 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.71 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.71 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.71 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 252
% 0.26/0.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 63
% 0.26/0.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.26/0.71 # Negative unit clauses : 18
% 0.26/0.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 170
% 0.26/0.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1063
% 0.26/0.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 2344
% 0.26/0.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.26/0.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4823
% 0.26/0.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3906
% 0.26/0.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 50
% 0.26/0.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 331
% 0.26/0.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 33
% 0.26/0.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 0.26/0.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 25911
% 0.26/0.71
% 0.26/0.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.71 # User time : 0.054 s
% 0.26/0.71 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.26/0.71 # Total time : 0.068 s
% 0.26/0.71 # Maximum resident set size: 3212 pages
% 0.26/0.71
% 0.26/0.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.71 # User time : 0.073 s
% 0.26/0.71 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.26/0.71 # Total time : 0.091 s
% 0.26/0.71 # Maximum resident set size: 2256 pages
% 0.26/0.71 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.26/0.71 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------