TSTP Solution File: LCL813-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL813-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:33:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.66s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 6 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_typing_OVar_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uagcNcoDx/E---3.1_25963.p',cls_typing_OVar_0) ).
cnf(cls_shift__eq_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uagcNcoDx/E---3.1_25963.p',cls_shift__eq_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uagcNcoDx/E---3.1_25963.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
cls_typing_OVar_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
cls_shift__eq_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : LCL813-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:24:30 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.51 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uagcNcoDx/E---3.1_25963.p
% 0.66/0.63 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.66/0.63 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.66/0.63 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 26069 completed with status 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.66/0.63 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.66/0.63 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.66/0.63 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.66/0.63 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 90s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 26081 completed with status 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Result found by G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.66/0.63 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.66/0.63 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.66/0.63 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.66/0.63 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 0.66/0.63 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 0.66/0.63 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.66/0.63
% 0.66/0.63 # Proof found!
% 0.66/0.63 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.66/0.63 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.66/0.63 # Parsed axioms : 936
% 0.66/0.63 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Initial clauses : 936
% 0.66/0.63 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.66/0.63 # Initial clauses in saturation : 935
% 0.66/0.63 # Processed clauses : 1079
% 0.66/0.63 # ...of these trivial : 57
% 0.66/0.63 # ...subsumed : 154
% 0.66/0.63 # ...remaining for further processing : 868
% 0.66/0.63 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.66/0.63 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.66/0.63 # Generated clauses : 58
% 0.66/0.63 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 41
% 0.66/0.63 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.66/0.63 # Paramodulations : 55
% 0.66/0.63 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.66/0.63 # NegExts : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.66/0.63 # Total rewrite steps : 145
% 0.66/0.63 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.63 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.63 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.63 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.63 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.63 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.66/0.63 # Current number of processed clauses : 124
% 0.66/0.63 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 87
% 0.66/0.63 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Negative unit clauses : 17
% 0.66/0.63 # Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.66/0.63 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 631
% 0.66/0.63 # ...number of literals in the above : 1643
% 0.66/0.63 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Current number of archived clauses : 745
% 0.66/0.63 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34369
% 0.66/0.63 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24138
% 0.66/0.63 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 130
% 0.66/0.63 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 453
% 0.66/0.63 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # BW rewrite match attempts : 85
% 0.66/0.63 # BW rewrite match successes : 29
% 0.66/0.63 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.66/0.63 # Termbank termtop insertions : 31385
% 0.66/0.63
% 0.66/0.63 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.66/0.63 # User time : 0.082 s
% 0.66/0.63 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.66/0.63 # Total time : 0.090 s
% 0.66/0.63 # Maximum resident set size: 3360 pages
% 0.66/0.63
% 0.66/0.63 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.66/0.63 # User time : 0.283 s
% 0.66/0.63 # System time : 0.027 s
% 0.66/0.63 # Total time : 0.309 s
% 0.66/0.63 # Maximum resident set size: 2332 pages
% 0.66/0.63 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------