TSTP Solution File: LCL809-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : LCL809-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:21:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Timeout 1.25s 300.19s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,v_u____,v_i____),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0zAsS5gEkn/E---3.1_20869.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_lift__IT_0,axiom,
    ( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(X1,X2))
    | ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0zAsS5gEkn/E---3.1_20869.p',cls_lift__IT_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,v_u____,v_i____)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0zAsS5gEkn/E---3.1_20869.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,v_u____,v_i____),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    ( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(X1,X2))
    | ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
    cls_lift__IT_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,v_u____,v_i____)),
    cls_CHAINED_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.24  % Problem    : LCL809-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.24/0.25  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.25/0.46  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.25/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.25/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.25/0.46  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.25/0.46  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.25/0.46  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.25/0.46  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.25/0.46  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 12:15:06 EDT 2023
% 0.25/0.46  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.32/0.71  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.32/0.71  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0zAsS5gEkn/E---3.1_20869.p
% 1.25/300.19  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1.25/300.19  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.25/300.19  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # new_bool_3 with pid 21032 completed with status 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.25/300.19  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.25/300.19  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.25/300.19  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.25/300.19  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 21035 completed with status 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 1.25/300.19  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.25/300.19  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.25/300.19  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.25/300.19  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.25/300.19  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 1.25/300.19  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 1.25/300.19  
% 1.25/300.19  # Proof found!
% 1.25/300.19  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.25/300.19  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/300.19  # Parsed axioms                        : 1239
% 1.25/300.19  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 824
% 1.25/300.19  # Initial clauses                      : 415
% 1.25/300.19  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 415
% 1.25/300.19  # Processed clauses                    : 21
% 1.25/300.19  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 1.25/300.19  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 1.25/300.19  # ...remaining for further processing  : 13
% 1.25/300.19  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 1.25/300.19  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 1.25/300.19  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Total rewrite steps                  : 6
% 1.25/300.19  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.25/300.19  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.25/300.19  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.25/300.19  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.25/300.19  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.25/300.19  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.25/300.19  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.25/300.19  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.25/300.19  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.25/300.19  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.25/300.19  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.25/300.19  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.25/300.19  # Current number of processed clauses  : 13
% 1.25/300.19  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 1.25/300.19  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.25/300.19  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 1.25/300.19  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 1.25/300.19  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 394
% 1.25/300.19  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1083
% 1.25/300.19  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 1.25/300.19  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.25/300.19  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 18332
% 1.25/300.19  
% 1.25/300.19  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.25/300.19  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 1.25/300.19  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 1.25/300.19  # Total time               : 0.024 s
% 1.25/300.19  # Maximum resident set size: 3032 pages
% 1.25/300.19  
% 1.25/300.19  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.25/300.19  # User time                : 0.047 s
% 1.25/300.19  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 1.25/300.19  # Total time               : 0.060 s
% 1.25/300.19  # Maximum resident set size: 2536 pages
% 1.25/300.19  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.25/300.19  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------