TSTP Solution File: LCL808-1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : LCL808-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:46:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.57s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f109,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f65,f108]) ).
fof(f108,plain,
! [X0] : ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,X0),
inference(resolution,[],[f107,f68]) ).
fof(f68,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_03) ).
fof(f107,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_Type_Otyping(X0,v_u____,v_T____)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X0,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,X1) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f106,f63]) ).
fof(f63,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_uIT_0) ).
fof(f106,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X0,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,X1)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X0,v_u____,v_T____) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f69,f66]) ).
fof(f66,axiom,
! [X26,X24,X25,X23] :
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,X23,X24))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X25,X23,v_T____)
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X23)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X25,X24,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,X26) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
fof(f69,axiom,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,v_u____,v_i____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f65,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,v_Ua____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL808-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 03:11:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.55 % (2272)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.19/0.55 % (2289)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.55 % (2273)lrs+1010_1:4_amm=off:bce=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=included:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.56 % (2273)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (2273)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.56 % (2273)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.56 % (2273)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.56 % (2273)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 % (2273)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.56 % (2273)Time elapsed: 0.116 s
% 0.19/0.56 % (2273)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.56 % (2273)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.56 % (2273)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.56 % (2281)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.19/0.56 % (2288)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=97:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/97Mi)
% 0.19/0.56 % (2280)dis+1011_3:29_av=off:awrs=decay:awrsf=32:bce=on:drc=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:nwc=2.0:spb=goal_then_units:updr=off:urr=ec_only:i=29:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/29Mi)
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.57 % (2281)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.57 % (2281)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 % (2281)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.57 % (2281)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.57 % (2281)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.57 % (2281)Termination phase: Finite model building preprocessing
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.57 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.57 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)Time elapsed: 0.127 s
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 % (2289)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 % (2265)Success in time 0.214 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------