TSTP Solution File: LCL808-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL808-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:33:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem  : LCL808-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 15:01:38 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.38  The process was started by sandbox2 on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.38  Sat Jul  2 15:01:38 2022
% 0.15/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11721.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  list(usable).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.38  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.15/0.38  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.15/0.38  clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Opreorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|C=B|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A)|C=B.
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|B=C|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,A,tc_nat).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_nat).
% 0.15/0.38  17 back subsumes 9.
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [copy,30,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,32,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(C).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 40 during input processing: 0 [copy,38,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(C).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [copy,40,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [copy,41,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(B).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 51 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,B,tc_nat)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,A,tc_nat)|B=A.
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 68 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [copy,63,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.38  63 back subsumes 49.
% 0.15/0.38  63 back subsumes 48.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.22/0.45  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.22/0.45  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.22/0.45  number of clauses in intial UL: 45
% 0.22/0.45  number of clauses initially in problem: 71
% 0.22/0.45  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 63
% 0.22/0.45  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.22/0.45  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.22/0.45  absolute distinct symbol count: 31
% 0.22/0.45     distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.22/0.45     distinct function count: 9
% 0.22/0.45     distinct constant count: 10
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.22/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.53  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.12 sec ----> 1348 [binary,1347.1,47.1] {-} $F.
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.22/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.53  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  46 [] {+} c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,A,B))| -c_Type_Otyping(C,A,v_T____)| -c_InductTermi_OIT(A)| -c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(C,B,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,D).
% 0.22/0.53  47 [] {+} -c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,v_u____,v_i____)).
% 0.22/0.53  68 [] {-} c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____).
% 0.22/0.53  71 [] {-} c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,v_Ua____).
% 0.22/0.53  72 [] {-} c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____).
% 0.22/0.53  1347 [hyper,71,46,72,68] {-} c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,v_u____,v_i____)).
% 0.22/0.53  1348 [binary,1347.1,47.1] {-} $F.
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.53  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  ============ end of search ============
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  Process 11721 finished Sat Jul  2 15:01:38 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------