TSTP Solution File: LCL808-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL808-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:33:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,X1,X2))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X3,X1,v_T____)
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X3,X2,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fwnMLOQZe1/E---3.1_14933.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,v_Ua____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fwnMLOQZe1/E---3.1_14933.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_03,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fwnMLOQZe1/E---3.1_14933.p',cls_CHAINED_0_03) ).
cnf(cls_uIT_0,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fwnMLOQZe1/E---3.1_14933.p',cls_uIT_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,v_u____,v_i____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fwnMLOQZe1/E---3.1_14933.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,X1,X2))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X3,X1,v_T____)
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X3,X2,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,X4) ),
cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_b____,v_Ua____),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,X1,v_i____))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,X1,v_T____)
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
cls_CHAINED_0_03 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_u____),
cls_uIT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_b____,v_u____,v_i____)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : LCL808-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:53:36 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fwnMLOQZe1/E---3.1_14933.p
% 0.21/0.51 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # sh5l with pid 15013 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 139s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 15017 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 139s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 75
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses : 69
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 69
% 0.21/0.51 # Processed clauses : 78
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # ...subsumed : 14
% 0.21/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 62
% 0.21/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Generated clauses : 109
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 88
% 0.21/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Paramodulations : 103
% 0.21/0.51 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 35
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 61
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 36
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 79
% 0.21/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 181
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 188
% 0.21/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 138
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.21/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2183
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------