TSTP Solution File: LCL805-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL805-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:33:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.43s 0.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 7 ( 2 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MzW7zroGxv/E---3.1_11734.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nil__is__map__conv_1,axiom,
c_List_Olist_ONil(X1) = c_List_Omap(X2,c_List_Olist_ONil(X3),X3,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MzW7zroGxv/E---3.1_11734.p',cls_Nil__is__map__conv_1) ).
cnf(cls_listsp_ONil_0,axiom,
c_List_Olistsp(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MzW7zroGxv/E---3.1_11734.p',cls_listsp_ONil_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_List_Olist_ONil(X1) = c_List_Omap(X2,c_List_Olist_ONil(X3),X3,X1),
cls_Nil__is__map__conv_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_List_Olistsp(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2),
cls_listsp_ONil_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : LCL805-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:40:16 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.58 Running first-order model finding
% 0.40/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MzW7zroGxv/E---3.1_11734.p
% 0.43/0.66 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.43/0.66 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.43/0.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # new_bool_3 with pid 11849 completed with status 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.43/0.66 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.43/0.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.43/0.66 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.43/0.66 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 45s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 11852 completed with status 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.43/0.66 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.43/0.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.43/0.66 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.43/0.66 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.43/0.66 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 45s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.66 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.43/0.66
% 0.43/0.66 # Proof found!
% 0.43/0.66 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.43/0.66 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.43/0.66 # Parsed axioms : 919
% 0.43/0.66 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 433
% 0.43/0.66 # Initial clauses : 486
% 0.43/0.66 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Initial clauses in saturation : 486
% 0.43/0.66 # Processed clauses : 105
% 0.43/0.66 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.43/0.66 # ...subsumed : 20
% 0.43/0.66 # ...remaining for further processing : 76
% 0.43/0.66 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.43/0.66 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.43/0.66 # Generated clauses : 58
% 0.43/0.66 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 40
% 0.43/0.66 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Paramodulations : 54
% 0.43/0.66 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # NegExts : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.43/0.66 # Total rewrite steps : 27
% 0.43/0.66 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.66 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.66 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.66 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.66 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.66 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.66 # Current number of processed clauses : 71
% 0.43/0.66 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 0.43/0.66 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Negative unit clauses : 15
% 0.43/0.66 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.43/0.66 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 421
% 0.43/0.66 # ...number of literals in the above : 804
% 0.43/0.66 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.43/0.66 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 227
% 0.43/0.66 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 216
% 0.43/0.66 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 0.43/0.66 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 79
% 0.43/0.66 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.43/0.66 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.43/0.66 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.43/0.66 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13853
% 0.43/0.66
% 0.43/0.66 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/0.66 # User time : 0.032 s
% 0.43/0.66 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.43/0.66 # Total time : 0.044 s
% 0.43/0.66 # Maximum resident set size: 3008 pages
% 0.43/0.66
% 0.43/0.66 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/0.66 # User time : 0.087 s
% 0.43/0.66 # System time : 0.016 s
% 0.43/0.66 # Total time : 0.103 s
% 0.43/0.66 # Maximum resident set size: 2336 pages
% 0.43/0.66 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------