TSTP Solution File: LCL795-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL795-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:21:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 2 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 9 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.je3K3VBMaf/E---3.1_31599.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_T_0,axiom,
v_T____ = hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.je3K3VBMaf/E---3.1_31599.p',cls_T_0) ).
cnf(cls_lift__type_0,axiom,
( c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(X4,X2),X5)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.je3K3VBMaf/E---3.1_31599.p',cls_lift__type_0) ).
cnf(cls_uT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.je3K3VBMaf/E---3.1_31599.p',cls_uT_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
v_T____ = hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
cls_T_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_u____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_T____),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(X4,X2),X5)
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X1,X4,X5) ),
cls_lift__type_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____),
cls_uT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.21 % Problem : LCL795-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.22 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.21/0.43 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.43 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.21/0.43 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.21/0.43 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.21/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 13:02:58 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.47/0.65 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.47/0.65 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.je3K3VBMaf/E---3.1_31599.p
% 0.49/0.76 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.49/0.76 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # new_bool_1 with pid 31679 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.49/0.76 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.49/0.76 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.76 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 31682 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.49/0.76 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.49/0.76 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.76 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.49/0.76 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.76 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.49/0.76
% 0.49/0.76 # Proof found!
% 0.49/0.76 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.76 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/0.76 # Parsed axioms : 920
% 0.49/0.76 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 553
% 0.49/0.76 # Initial clauses : 367
% 0.49/0.76 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Initial clauses in saturation : 367
% 0.49/0.76 # Processed clauses : 376
% 0.49/0.76 # ...of these trivial : 31
% 0.49/0.76 # ...subsumed : 67
% 0.49/0.76 # ...remaining for further processing : 278
% 0.49/0.76 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.49/0.76 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.49/0.76 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.49/0.76 # Generated clauses : 4105
% 0.49/0.76 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3537
% 0.49/0.76 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.49/0.76 # Paramodulations : 4072
% 0.49/0.76 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.49/0.76 # NegExts : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Equation resolutions : 29
% 0.49/0.76 # Total rewrite steps : 1803
% 0.49/0.76 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.76 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.76 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.76 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.76 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.76 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.49/0.76 # Current number of processed clauses : 270
% 0.49/0.76 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 61
% 0.49/0.76 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.49/0.76 # Negative unit clauses : 16
% 0.49/0.76 # Non-unit-clauses : 188
% 0.49/0.76 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3528
% 0.49/0.76 # ...number of literals in the above : 8675
% 0.49/0.76 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.49/0.76 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7035
% 0.49/0.76 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6542
% 0.49/0.76 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 51
% 0.49/0.76 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 394
% 0.49/0.76 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # BW rewrite match attempts : 88
% 0.49/0.76 # BW rewrite match successes : 31
% 0.49/0.76 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.49/0.76 # Termbank termtop insertions : 92088
% 0.49/0.76
% 0.49/0.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.76 # User time : 0.072 s
% 0.49/0.76 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.49/0.76 # Total time : 0.081 s
% 0.49/0.76 # Maximum resident set size: 2832 pages
% 0.49/0.76
% 0.49/0.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.76 # User time : 0.096 s
% 0.49/0.76 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.49/0.76 # Total time : 0.106 s
% 0.49/0.76 # Maximum resident set size: 2316 pages
% 0.49/0.76 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.49/0.77 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------