TSTP Solution File: LCL788-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : LCL788-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:26:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.77s 0.95s
% Output : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 10 ( 6 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 9 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_foldr__foldl_0,axiom,
c_List_Ofoldr(X,Y,Z,U,V) = c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(X,U,V,V),Z,c_List_Orev(Y,U),V,U),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_foldr__foldl_0) ).
cnf(cls_typing__elims_I1_J_0,axiom,
( hAPP(X,Y) = Z
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(Y),Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typing__elims_I1_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_True_0,axiom,
v_n____ = v_i____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_True_0) ).
cnf(cls_shift__eq_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X,Y,Z,U),Y) = Z,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_shift__eq_0) ).
cnf(cls_varT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_varT_0) ).
cnf(205,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_i____),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(c_Type_Otype_OFun,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),v_T_H____,c_List_Orev(v_Ts____,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_varT_0,cls_foldr__foldl_0,cls_True_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
v_T____ != hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(211,plain,
v_T____ != hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_T_H_H____),c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(c_Type_Otype_OFun,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),v_T_H____,c_List_Orev(v_Ts____,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,cls_foldr__foldl_0,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1284,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_typing__elims_I1_J_0,205]),211,cls_shift__eq_0,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LCL788-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 18:17:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 "."
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T18:17:01
% 0.19/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n012.cluster.edu at 2022-07-03T18:17:01
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 #||
% 0.77/0.95 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.95 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.77/0.95 ||#
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.77/0.95 ; 2340 formulas have been input or derived (from 155 formulas).
% 0.77/0.95 ; 1284 (55%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.77/0.95 ; 61 ( 5%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.77/0.95 ; 1223 (95%) are still being kept.
% 0.77/0.95 ;
% 0.77/0.95 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.048 10% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.005 1% Assert (242 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.154 32% Process new row (2,169 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.043 9% Resolution (308 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.019 4% Paramodulation (154 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (15 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.012 2% Condensing (584 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.021 4% Forward subsumption (584 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.010 2% Backward subsumption (435 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.006 1% Clause clause subsumption (687 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.069 14% Forward simplification (2,168 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.020 4% Backward simplification (1,269 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.037 8% Ordering (6,509 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.035 7% Other
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.480 Total
% 0.77/0.95 ; 0.481 Real time
% 0.77/0.95 ;
% 0.77/0.95 ; Term-hash-array has 3,618 terms in all.
% 0.77/0.95 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 413 entries (413 at peak, 435 added, 22 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,552 nodes (2,552 at peak, 2,787 added, 235 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95 ; Retrieved 973 possibly forward subsuming rows in 584 calls.
% 0.77/0.95 ; Retrieved 114 possibly backward subsumed rows in 435 calls.
% 0.77/0.95 ; Path-index has 3,515 entries (3,515 at peak, 3,694 added, 179 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95 ; Path-index has 9,462 nodes (9,462 at peak, 9,810 added, 348 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95 ; Trie-index has 3,515 entries (3,515 at peak, 3,694 added, 179 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95 ; Trie-index has 18,761 nodes (18,761 at peak, 19,993 added, 1,232 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95 ; Retrieved 6,259 generalization terms in 11,677 calls.
% 0.77/0.95 ; Retrieved 1,429 instance terms in 963 calls.
% 0.77/0.95 ; Retrieved 44,252 unifiable terms in 1,893 calls.
% 0.77/0.95 ;
% 0.77/0.95 ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.77/0.95 ; 3 with value 29 1 with value 35 1 with value 45
% 0.77/0.95 ; 1 with value 34
% 0.77/0.95 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 34 entries:
% 0.77/0.95 ; 1 with value 28 3 with value 33 1 with value 41
% 0.77/0.95 ; 3 with value 29 6 with value 34 1 with value 42
% 0.77/0.95 ; 2 with value 30 4 with value 36 1 with value 44
% 0.77/0.95 ; 3 with value 31 1 with value 37 3 with value 47
% 0.77/0.95 ; 1 with value 32 3 with value 38 1 with value 59
% 0.77/0.95 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1035 entries:
% 0.77/0.95 ; 1 with value (4 5) 29 with value (4 20) 80 with value (4 33)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 1 with value (4 7) 45 with value (4 21) 30 with value (4 34)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 2 with value (4 8) 45 with value (4 22) 23 with value (4 35)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 4 with value (4 9) 67 with value (4 23) 17 with value (4 36)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 5 with value (4 10) 66 with value (4 24) 34 with value (4 37)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 9 with value (4 11) 57 with value (4 25) 13 with value (4 38)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 8 with value (4 12) 76 with value (4 26) 10 with value (4 39)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 20 with value (4 13) 30 with value (4 27) 15 with value (4 40)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 11 with value (4 14) 26 with value (4 28) 3 with value (4 41)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 30 with value (4 15) 30 with value (4 29) 2 with value (4 42)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 18 with value (4 16) 62 with value (4 30) 9 with value (4 43)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 14 with value (4 17) 26 with value (4 31) 8 with value (4 44)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 26 with value (4 18) 43 with value (4 32) 4 with value (4 47)
% 0.77/0.95 ; 36 with value (4 19)
% 0.77/0.95 Evaluation took:
% 0.77/0.95 0.481 seconds of real time
% 0.77/0.95 0.457794 seconds of user run time
% 0.77/0.95 0.023776 seconds of system run time
% 0.77/0.95 [Run times include 0.025 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.77/0.95 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.77/0.95 0 page faults and
% 0.77/0.95 30,012,984 bytes consed.
% 0.77/0.95 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.77/0.95 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T18:17:02
% 0.77/0.95 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.77/0.95 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------