TSTP Solution File: LCL786-1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : LCL786-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:18:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____),v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)))
    | ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____))
    | v_thesis____ ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_T_H____))
    | c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_list__app__typeD_1)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_T_H____))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____),v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_list__app__typeD_0)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_T_H____)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL786-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 20:19:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  % symbols: 103
% 0.12/0.36  % clauses: 576
% 0.12/0.36  % start clauses: 1
% 0.12/0.36  % iterative deepening steps: 45
% 0.12/0.36  % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.12/0.36  % literal attempts: 1142
% 0.12/0.36  % depth failures: 983
% 0.12/0.36  % regularity failures: 11
% 0.12/0.36  % tautology failures: 4
% 0.12/0.36  % reductions: 10
% 0.12/0.36  % extensions: 1101
% 0.12/0.36  % SAT variables: 1396
% 0.12/0.36  % SAT clauses: 1082
% 0.12/0.36  % WalkSAT solutions: 1079
% 0.12/0.36  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------