TSTP Solution File: LCL785-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL785-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:33:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 6 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 11 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_T_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpdCGD9rLE/E---3.1_25073.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_True_0,axiom,
v_n____ = v_i____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpdCGD9rLE/E---3.1_25073.p',cls_True_0) ).
cnf(cls_nT_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____),v_rs____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_T_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpdCGD9rLE/E---3.1_25073.p',cls_nT_0) ).
cnf(cls_foldl__Cons_0,axiom,
c_List_Ofoldl(X1,X2,c_List_Olist_OCons(X3,X4,X5),X6,X5) = c_List_Ofoldl(X1,hAPP(hAPP(X1,X2),X3),X4,X6,X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpdCGD9rLE/E---3.1_25073.p',cls_foldl__Cons_0) ).
cnf(cls_Cons_0,axiom,
v_rs____ = c_List_Olist_OCons(v_a____,v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpdCGD9rLE/E---3.1_25073.p',cls_Cons_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_T_H____),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
v_n____ = v_i____,
cls_True_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____),v_rs____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_T_H____),
cls_nT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_T_H____),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
c_List_Ofoldl(X1,X2,c_List_Olist_OCons(X3,X4,X5),X6,X5) = c_List_Ofoldl(X1,hAPP(hAPP(X1,X2),X3),X4,X6,X5),
cls_foldl__Cons_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
v_rs____ = c_List_Olist_OCons(v_a____,v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB),
cls_Cons_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____),v_rs____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_T_H____),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : LCL785-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:53:23 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.53 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpdCGD9rLE/E---3.1_25073.p
% 0.23/0.58 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 25292 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.23/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.58 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 110s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 110s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 110s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 110s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 25305 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Result found by G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.23/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.58 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 110s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 110s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.58 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.58 # Parsed axioms : 418
% 0.23/0.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Initial clauses : 418
% 0.23/0.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.23/0.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 417
% 0.23/0.58 # Processed clauses : 229
% 0.23/0.58 # ...of these trivial : 30
% 0.23/0.58 # ...subsumed : 23
% 0.23/0.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 176
% 0.23/0.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.23/0.58 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Total rewrite steps : 39
% 0.23/0.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 174
% 0.23/0.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 61
% 0.23/0.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.23/0.58 # Negative unit clauses : 14
% 0.23/0.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 94
% 0.23/0.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 188
% 0.23/0.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 448
% 0.23/0.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1984
% 0.23/0.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1854
% 0.23/0.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 0.23/0.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 171
% 0.23/0.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 442
% 0.23/0.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 154
% 0.23/0.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 138
% 0.23/0.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9106
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.58 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/0.58 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.58 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.23/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2512 pages
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.58 # User time : 0.073 s
% 0.23/0.58 # System time : 0.024 s
% 0.23/0.58 # Total time : 0.098 s
% 0.23/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2012 pages
% 0.23/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------