TSTP Solution File: LCL779_5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : LCL779_5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 1 03:20:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.61s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 45
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 50 ( 7 unt; 43 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 3 usr)
% Number of type conns : 56 ( 28 >; 28 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 34 ( 34 usr; 9 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 !; 0 ?; 30 :)
% ( 30 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
bool: $tType ).
tff(type_def_6,type,
dB: $tType ).
tff(type_def_7,type,
list: $tType > $tType ).
tff(type_def_8,type,
nat: $tType ).
tff(type_def_9,type,
fun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
zero_zero:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
it: fun(dB,bool) ).
tff(func_def_2,type,
beta: fun(dB,fun(dB,bool)) ).
tff(func_def_3,type,
abs: dB > dB ).
tff(func_def_4,type,
app: fun(dB,fun(dB,dB)) ).
tff(func_def_5,type,
var: nat > dB ).
tff(func_def_6,type,
dB_case:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( fun(nat,X0) * fun(dB,fun(dB,X0)) * fun(dB,X0) * dB ) > X0 ) ).
tff(func_def_7,type,
dB_size: dB > nat ).
tff(func_def_8,type,
liftn: ( nat * dB * nat ) > dB ).
tff(func_def_9,type,
subst: ( dB * dB * nat ) > dB ).
tff(func_def_10,type,
substn: ( dB * dB * nat ) > dB ).
tff(func_def_11,type,
append:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( list(X0) * list(X0) ) > list(X0) ) ).
tff(func_def_12,type,
foldl:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( ( fun(X0,fun(X1,X0)) * X0 * list(X1) ) > X0 ) ).
tff(func_def_13,type,
insert:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * list(X0) ) > list(X0) ) ).
tff(func_def_14,type,
cons:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * list(X0) ) > list(X0) ) ).
tff(func_def_15,type,
nil:
!>[X0: $tType] : list(X0) ).
tff(func_def_16,type,
list_case:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( ( X0 * fun(X1,fun(list(X1),X0)) * list(X1) ) > X0 ) ).
tff(func_def_17,type,
list_rec:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( ( X0 * fun(X1,fun(list(X1),fun(X0,X0))) * list(X1) ) > X0 ) ).
tff(func_def_18,type,
list_size:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( fun(X0,nat) * list(X0) ) > nat ) ).
tff(func_def_19,type,
sublist:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( list(X0) * fun(nat,bool) ) > list(X0) ) ).
tff(func_def_20,type,
size_size:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > nat ) ).
tff(func_def_21,type,
aa:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( ( fun(X0,X1) * X0 ) > X1 ) ).
tff(func_def_22,type,
fFalse: bool ).
tff(func_def_23,type,
fTrue: bool ).
tff(func_def_24,type,
i: nat ).
tff(func_def_25,type,
r: dB ).
tff(func_def_26,type,
s: dB ).
tff(func_def_27,type,
ss: list(dB) ).
tff(func_def_28,type,
sK0:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( fun(X0,fun(X1,X0)) > X1 ) ).
tff(func_def_29,type,
sK1:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( fun(X0,fun(X1,X0)) > X1 ) ).
tff(func_def_30,type,
sK2:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( fun(X0,fun(X1,X0)) > X0 ) ).
tff(func_def_31,type,
sK3:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( ( fun(X1,X0) * fun(X1,X0) ) > X1 ) ).
tff(pred_def_1,type,
zero:
!>[X0: $tType] : $o ).
tff(pred_def_2,type,
step1:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( fun(X0,fun(X0,bool)) * list(X0) * list(X0) ) > $o ) ).
tff(pred_def_3,type,
list_ex1:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( fun(X0,bool) * list(X0) ) > $o ) ).
tff(pred_def_4,type,
listsp:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( fun(X0,bool) * list(X0) ) > $o ) ).
tff(pred_def_5,type,
member:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * fun(X0,bool) ) > $o ) ).
tff(pred_def_6,type,
pp: bool > $o ).
tff(f181,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f148,f146]) ).
tff(f146,plain,
pp(aa(dB,bool,it,s)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).
tff(f105,axiom,
pp(aa(dB,bool,it,s)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bLMoMtFKPV/Vampire---4.8_26902',conj_2) ).
tff(f148,plain,
~ pp(aa(dB,bool,it,s)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).
tff(f109,plain,
~ pp(aa(dB,bool,it,s)),
inference(flattening,[],[f108]) ).
tff(f108,negated_conjecture,
~ pp(aa(dB,bool,it,s)),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f107]) ).
tff(f107,conjecture,
pp(aa(dB,bool,it,s)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bLMoMtFKPV/Vampire---4.8_26902',conj_4) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : LCL779_5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 16:37:57 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.31 This is a TF1_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.10/0.32 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bLMoMtFKPV/Vampire---4.8_26902
% 0.61/0.80 % (27015)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27014)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27016)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27018)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27019)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27020)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27021)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.80 % (27016)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.80 % (27020)WARNING: Not using newCnf currently not compatible with polymorphic/higher-order inputs.
% 0.61/0.80 % (27019)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.61/0.80 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.80
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)Memory used [KB]: 1100
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80 % (27017)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80 % (27011)Success in time 0.485 s
% 0.61/0.81 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------