TSTP Solution File: LCL778-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : LCL778-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:33:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   9 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_r),v_s),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_i)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gCywG6WvwC/E---3.1_12666.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_r),v_s),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_i)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gCywG6WvwC/E---3.1_12666.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_r),v_s),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_i)))),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_r),v_s),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_i)))),
    cls_conjecture_4 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : LCL778-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 12:44:16 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gCywG6WvwC/E---3.1_12666.p
% 0.17/0.49  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # new_bool_3 with pid 12751 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.49  # Search class: FGUSM-FFLS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 75s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12755 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.49  # Search class: FGUSM-FFLS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 75s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.49  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 549
% 0.17/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 397
% 0.17/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 152
% 0.17/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 152
% 0.17/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 0.17/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.17/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 12
% 0.17/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.17/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 11
% 0.17/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.17/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.17/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.17/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 136
% 0.17/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 232
% 0.17/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.17/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.17/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7440
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.49  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 2416 pages
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.49  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Total time               : 0.024 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 2104 pages
% 0.17/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------