TSTP Solution File: LCL764-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL764-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:33:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LIlblTQDJW/E---3.1_25814.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_listsp_ONil_0,axiom,
c_List_Olistsp(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LIlblTQDJW/E---3.1_25814.p',cls_listsp_ONil_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
c_List_Olistsp(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2),
cls_listsp_ONil_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : LCL764-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:39:36 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LIlblTQDJW/E---3.1_25814.p
% 0.37/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.37/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # new_bool_1 with pid 25893 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.37/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.53 # Search class: FHUSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.53 # partial match(1): FHUPM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 200s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 101s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with pid 25896 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d
% 0.37/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.53 # Search class: FHUSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.53 # partial match(1): FHUPM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 200s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 101s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.37/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/0.53
% 0.37/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 329
% 0.37/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 286
% 0.37/0.53 # Initial clauses : 43
% 0.37/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 0.37/0.53 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.37/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.37/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.37/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.37/0.53 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.37/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.37/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.37/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.37/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.37/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 36
% 0.37/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 55
% 0.37/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.37/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.37/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.37/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2780
% 0.37/0.53
% 0.37/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.53 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.37/0.53 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.37/0.53 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.37/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 2232 pages
% 0.37/0.53
% 0.37/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.53 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.37/0.53 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.37/0.53 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.37/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1944 pages
% 0.37/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------