TSTP Solution File: LCL764-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL764-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:21:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.M6eXnGpKIV/E---3.1_10381.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_listsp_ONil_0,axiom,
c_List_Olistsp(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.M6eXnGpKIV/E---3.1_10381.p',cls_listsp_ONil_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
c_List_Olistsp(X1,c_List_Olist_ONil(X2),X2),
cls_listsp_ONil_0 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.15 % Problem : LCL764-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.38 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:21:25 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.M6eXnGpKIV/E---3.1_10381.p
% 0.41/0.59 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.41/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # new_bool_3 with pid 10481 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.41/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.59 # Search class: FHUSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.59 # partial match(1): FHUPM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 200s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 101s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 10484 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.41/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.59 # Search class: FHUSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.59 # partial match(1): FHUPM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.41/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 200s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.41/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.41/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 329
% 0.41/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 286
% 0.41/0.59 # Initial clauses : 43
% 0.41/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 0.41/0.59 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.41/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.41/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.41/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.41/0.59 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.41/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.41/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.41/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 36
% 0.41/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 55
% 0.41/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.41/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.41/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.41/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.41/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2780
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.59 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.41/0.59 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.41/0.59 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.41/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2236 pages
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.59 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.41/0.59 # System time : 0.015 s
% 0.41/0.59 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.41/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 1940 pages
% 0.41/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.41/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------