TSTP Solution File: LCL760-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL760-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:39:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    6 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   21 (  21 usr;  12 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(567,axiom,
    equal(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,u),v),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Lambda_Osubstn(u,v,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
    file('LCL760-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(648,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_ra),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(u))),c_Suc(v))),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_s),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(u)),v)),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(u),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    file('LCL760-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(651,axiom,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_ra),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(v_ia))),c_Suc(v_ja))),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_s),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_ia)),v_ja)),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_ia),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_ja,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    file('LCL760-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(731,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_Osubstn(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_ra),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(u))),c_Suc(v)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_s),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(u)),v),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(u),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[567,648]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:567.0,648.0')] ).

cnf(732,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_Osubstn(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_ra),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(v_ia))),c_Suc(v_ja)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_s),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_ia)),v_ja),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_ia),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_ja,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[567,651]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:567.0,651.0')] ).

cnf(733,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[732,731]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:732.0,731.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem  : LCL760-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 16:04:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.41/0.57  
% 0.41/0.57  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.41/0.57  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.41/0.57  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.57  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.41/0.57  SPASS derived 3 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 513 clauses.
% 0.41/0.57  SPASS allocated 76848 KBytes.
% 0.41/0.57  SPASS spent	0:00:00.23 on the problem.
% 0.41/0.57  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.41/0.57  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.41/0.57  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.41/0.57  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.41/0.57  		0:00:00.11 for the reduction.
% 0.41/0.57  
% 0.41/0.57  
% 0.41/0.57  Here is a proof with depth 0, length 6 :
% 0.41/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.57  Formulae used in the proof : cls_substn__subst__0_0 cls_conjecture_1 cls_conjecture_4
% 0.41/0.57  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------