TSTP Solution File: LCL755-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL755-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:21:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 2 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(v_ia)),c_Suc(v_ja)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eoUaMb1OED/E---3.1_17273.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0,axiom,
c_Suc(X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eoUaMb1OED/E---3.1_17273.p',cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0) ).
cnf(cls_Lambda_0,axiom,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eoUaMb1OED/E---3.1_17273.p',cls_Lambda_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X1),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eoUaMb1OED/E---3.1_17273.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(v_ia)),c_Suc(v_ja)))),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_Suc(X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),
cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_ia,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat)),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_ja,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
cls_Lambda_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_ia,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat)),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_ja,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X1),X2)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.17 % Problem : LCL755-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.36 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.17/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 13:33:58 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eoUaMb1OED/E---3.1_17273.p
% 0.47/0.59 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.47/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 17351 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.47/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.47/0.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.59 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0i with 123s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with pid 17360 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Result found by U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN
% 0.47/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.47/0.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.59 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.47/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.47/0.59
% 0.47/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.47/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 755
% 0.47/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Initial clauses : 755
% 0.47/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.47/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 754
% 0.47/0.59 # Processed clauses : 806
% 0.47/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 21
% 0.47/0.59 # ...subsumed : 129
% 0.47/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 656
% 0.47/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 10
% 0.47/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.47/0.59 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.47/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.47/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.47/0.59 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.47/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 127
% 0.47/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 48
% 0.47/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 38
% 0.47/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.47/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.47/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 542
% 0.47/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 1421
% 0.47/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 609
% 0.47/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 40586
% 0.47/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24853
% 0.47/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 124
% 0.47/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
% 0.47/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 76
% 0.47/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 51
% 0.47/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.47/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 23603
% 0.47/0.59
% 0.47/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.59 # User time : 0.060 s
% 0.47/0.59 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.47/0.59 # Total time : 0.069 s
% 0.47/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 3052 pages
% 0.47/0.59
% 0.47/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.59 # User time : 0.290 s
% 0.47/0.59 # System time : 0.031 s
% 0.47/0.59 # Total time : 0.320 s
% 0.47/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2176 pages
% 0.47/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.47/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------