TSTP Solution File: LCL754-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL754-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:25:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.91s 1.11s
% Output   : Refutation 0.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   9 unt;   2 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (   6 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0,axiom,
    c_Suc(X) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0) ).

cnf(cls_zero__less__Suc_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Suc(X),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_zero__less__Suc_0) ).

cnf(cls_not__less__eq_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X,Y,tc_nat)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(Y,c_Suc(X),tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_not__less__eq_1) ).

cnf(cls_subst__Abs_0,axiom,
    c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X),Y,Z) = c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(X,c_Lambda_Olift(Y,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(Z,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subst__Abs_0) ).

cnf(368,plain,
    c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X),Y,Z) = c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(X,c_Lambda_Olift(Y,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Suc(Z))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_subst__Abs_0,cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(cls_lift_Osimps_I1_J_1,axiom,
    ( c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X),Y) = c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat))
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X,Y,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_lift_Osimps_I1_J_1) ).

cnf(376,plain,
    ( c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X),Y) = c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(X))
    | c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X,Y,tc_nat) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_lift_Osimps_I1_J_1,cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(cls_Lambda_0,axiom,
    ( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X))
    | ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Lambda_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X),Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_ra),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_ia),v_ja)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(476,plain,
    c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X),Y))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Lambda_0,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(760,plain,
    c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)) = c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_not__less__eq_1,376,cls_zero__less__Suc_0]) ).

cnf(1460,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2,368,theory(equality)]),476,760,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : LCL754-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 19:58:57 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  "."
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-04T19:58:57
% 0.18/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n017.cluster.edu at 2022-07-04T19:58:57
% 0.43/0.61  
% 0.43/0.61  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__1| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__1__no__zero__divisors| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Divides_Oring__div| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__ring__strict| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__by__zero| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Int_Onumber__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.62  WARNING:
% 0.43/0.62     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.91/1.11  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  #||
% 0.91/1.11  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/1.11  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.91/1.11  ||#
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.91/1.11  ;      5986 formulas have been input or derived (from 289 formulas).
% 0.91/1.11  ;      1460 (24%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.91/1.11  ;           59 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.91/1.11  ;         1401 (96%) are still being kept.
% 0.91/1.11  ; 
% 0.91/1.11  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.128  20%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.014   2%   Assert                       (718 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.099  15%   Process new row              (5,315 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.097  15%   Resolution                   (576 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.014   2%   Paramodulation               (288 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (8 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.021   3%   Condensing                   (2,124 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.074  12%   Forward subsumption          (2,124 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.025   4%   Backward subsumption         (943 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.025   4%   Clause clause subsumption    (5,118 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.075  12%   Forward simplification       (5,140 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.012   2%   Backward simplification      (1,435 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.016   2%   Ordering                     (6,872 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.038   6%   Other
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.641        Total
% 0.91/1.11  ;     0.642        Real time
% 0.91/1.11  ; 
% 0.91/1.11  ; Term-hash-array has 2,159 terms in all.
% 0.91/1.11  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 930 entries (930 at peak, 943 added, 13 deleted).
% 0.91/1.11  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,317 nodes (3,317 at peak, 3,386 added, 69 deleted).
% 0.91/1.11  ;  Retrieved 7,954 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,124 calls.
% 0.91/1.11  ;  Retrieved 680 possibly backward subsumed rows in 943 calls.
% 0.91/1.11  ; Path-index has 2,091 entries (2,091 at peak, 2,168 added, 77 deleted).
% 0.91/1.11  ; Path-index has 4,308 nodes (4,308 at peak, 4,387 added, 79 deleted).
% 0.91/1.11  ; Trie-index has 2,091 entries (2,091 at peak, 2,168 added, 77 deleted).
% 0.91/1.11  ; Trie-index has 6,603 nodes (6,603 at peak, 6,952 added, 349 deleted).
% 0.91/1.11  ; Retrieved 15,418 generalization terms in 19,066 calls.
% 0.91/1.11  ; Retrieved 1,088 instance terms in 603 calls.
% 0.91/1.11  ; Retrieved 106,176 unifiable terms in 2,807 calls.
% 0.91/1.11  ; 
% 0.91/1.11  ; The agenda of rows to process has 19 entries:
% 0.91/1.11  ;     1 with value 17              5 with value 26               1 with value 30
% 0.91/1.11  ;     1 with value 19              1 with value 27               1 with value 32
% 0.91/1.11  ;     2 with value 22              1 with value 28               1 with value 33
% 0.91/1.11  ;     1 with value 25              3 with value 29               1 with value 35
% 0.91/1.11  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 144 entries:
% 0.91/1.11  ;     2 with value 20              4 with value 26               3 with value 32
% 0.91/1.11  ;    22 with value 21             47 with value 27               1 with value 33
% 0.91/1.11  ;     9 with value 22              3 with value 28               3 with value 34
% 0.91/1.11  ;    11 with value 23              2 with value 29               1 with value 35
% 0.91/1.11  ;    14 with value 24              1 with value 30               7 with value 39
% 0.91/1.11  ;    11 with value 25              1 with value 31               2 with value 43
% 0.91/1.11  ; The agenda of rows to give has 968 entries:
% 0.91/1.11  ;     1 with value (4 6)          61 with value (4 16)          87 with value (4 26)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     1 with value (4 7)          70 with value (4 17)          36 with value (4 27)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     4 with value (4 8)          69 with value (4 18)          23 with value (4 28)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     6 with value (4 9)          58 with value (4 19)          20 with value (4 29)
% 0.91/1.11  ;     8 with value (4 10)         55 with value (4 20)          12 with value (4 30)
% 0.91/1.11  ;    23 with value (4 11)         29 with value (4 21)          10 with value (4 31)
% 0.91/1.11  ;    27 with value (4 12)         68 with value (4 22)           8 with value (4 32)
% 0.91/1.11  ;    40 with value (4 13)         62 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 33)
% 0.91/1.11  ;    35 with value (4 14)         43 with value (4 24)           3 with value (4 34)
% 0.91/1.11  ;    54 with value (4 15)         52 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 36)
% 0.91/1.11  Evaluation took:
% 0.91/1.11    0.642 seconds of real time
% 0.91/1.11    0.607208 seconds of user run time
% 0.91/1.11    0.034932 seconds of system run time
% 0.91/1.11    [Run times include 0.025 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.91/1.11    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.91/1.11    0 page faults and
% 0.91/1.11    47,716,336 bytes consed.
% 0.91/1.11  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.91/1.11  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-04T19:58:58
% 0.91/1.11  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.91/1.11  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------