TSTP Solution File: LCL748-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL748-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:03:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 5 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Lambda_0,axiom,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Lambda_0) ).
cnf(cls_lift_Osimps_I3_J_0,axiom,
c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1),X2) = c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Olift(X1,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_lift_Osimps_I3_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0,axiom,
c_Suc(X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r),v_ia)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(v_r,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Lambda_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1),X2) = c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Olift(X1,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat))),
cls_lift_Osimps_I3_J_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_Suc(X1) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),
cls_Suc__eq__plus1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Olift(X1,c_Suc(X2))) = c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1),X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r),v_ia)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1),X2))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(X1,c_Suc(X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(v_r,X1)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r),v_ia)),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : LCL748-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 02:42:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.53 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # new_bool_3 with pid 22969 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.53 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 109s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with pid 22977 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Result found by 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.53 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 109s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 370
% 0.21/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 184
% 0.21/0.53 # Initial clauses : 186
% 0.21/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 186
% 0.21/0.53 # Processed clauses : 245
% 0.21/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 0.21/0.53 # ...subsumed : 54
% 0.21/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 178
% 0.21/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.21/0.53 # Generated clauses : 45
% 0.21/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 42
% 0.21/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Paramodulations : 41
% 0.21/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.21/0.53 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 60
% 0.21/0.53 # ...of those cached : 38
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 41
% 0.21/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.21/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 17
% 0.21/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 116
% 0.21/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 210
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 137
% 0.21/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1151
% 0.21/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1132
% 0.21/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 31
% 0.21/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 131
% 0.21/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 6
% 0.21/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 62
% 0.21/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 38
% 0.21/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7028
% 0.21/0.53 # Search garbage collected termcells : 866
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.21/0.53 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 2188 pages
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.21/0.53 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1928 pages
% 0.21/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------