TSTP Solution File: LCL730^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : LCL730^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:22:24 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   5 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (  34 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  155 (  15   ~;   5   |;   8   &; 108   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :  108 ( 108   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (   0  !!;   0  ??;   3 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (   0   ^  42   !;  30   ?;  74   :)
%                                         (   2  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK0: ( ( b > $o ) > b ) > b > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK1: ( ( b > $o ) > b ) > b ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK2: ( ( b > $o ) > b > $o ) > ( b > $o ) > b ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK3: ( ( b > $o ) > b > $o ) > b > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    ph5: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(superposition,[],[f20,f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b] :
      ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b] :
        ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
          = $true )
        & ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
         != $true ) )
    & ! [X3: ( b > $o ) > b > $o] :
        ( ! [X5: b > $o] :
            ( ( X3 @ X5 @ ( sK2 @ X3 @ X5 ) )
            = $true )
        | ! [X7: b] :
            ( ( X3 @ ( sK3 @ X3 ) @ X7 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f7,f11,f10,f9,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b] :
      ( ? [X1: b > $o] :
          ( ? [X2: b] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
          & ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
           != $true ) )
     => ( ? [X2: b] :
            ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ X2 )
            = $true )
        & ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
         != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b] :
      ( ? [X2: b] :
          ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ X2 )
          = $true )
     => ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X3: ( b > $o ) > b > $o] :
      ( ? [X4: ( b > $o ) > b] :
        ! [X5: b > $o] :
          ( ( X3 @ X5 @ ( X4 @ X5 ) )
          = $true )
     => ! [X5: b > $o] :
          ( ( X3 @ X5 @ ( sK2 @ X3 @ X5 ) )
          = $true ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X3: ( b > $o ) > b > $o] :
      ( ? [X6: b > $o] :
        ! [X7: b] :
          ( $true
         != ( X3 @ X6 @ X7 ) )
     => ! [X7: b] :
          ( ( X3 @ ( sK3 @ X3 ) @ X7 )
         != $true ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b] :
      ? [X1: b > $o] :
        ( ? [X2: b] :
            ( ( X1 @ X2 )
            = $true )
        & ( ( X1 @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
         != $true ) )
    & ! [X3: ( b > $o ) > b > $o] :
        ( ? [X4: ( b > $o ) > b] :
          ! [X5: b > $o] :
            ( ( X3 @ X5 @ ( X4 @ X5 ) )
            = $true )
        | ? [X6: b > $o] :
          ! [X7: b] :
            ( $true
           != ( X3 @ X6 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ! [X5: ( b > $o ) > b] :
      ? [X6: b > $o] :
        ( ? [X7: b] :
            ( ( X6 @ X7 )
            = $true )
        & ( ( X6 @ ( X5 @ X6 ) )
         != $true ) )
    & ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b > $o] :
        ( ? [X3: ( b > $o ) > b] :
          ! [X4: b > $o] :
            ( ( X0 @ X4 @ ( X3 @ X4 ) )
            = $true )
        | ? [X1: b > $o] :
          ! [X2: b] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b > $o] :
          ( ! [X1: b > $o] :
            ? [X2: b] :
              ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
         => ? [X3: ( b > $o ) > b] :
            ! [X4: b > $o] :
              ( ( X0 @ X4 @ ( X3 @ X4 ) )
              = $true ) )
     => ? [X5: ( b > $o ) > b] :
        ! [X6: b > $o] :
          ( ? [X7: b] :
              ( ( X6 @ X7 )
              = $true )
         => ( ( X6 @ ( X5 @ X6 ) )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b > $o] :
          ( ! [X1: b > $o] :
            ? [X2: b] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
         => ? [X3: ( b > $o ) > b] :
            ! [X4: b > $o] : ( X0 @ X4 @ ( X3 @ X4 ) ) )
     => ? [X5: ( b > $o ) > b] :
        ! [X6: b > $o] :
          ( ? [X7: b] : ( X6 @ X7 )
         => ( X6 @ ( X5 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b > $o] :
          ( ! [X1: b > $o] :
            ? [X2: b] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
         => ? [X3: ( b > $o ) > b] :
            ! [X1: b > $o] : ( X0 @ X1 @ ( X3 @ X1 ) ) )
     => ? [X4: ( b > $o ) > b] :
        ! [X5: b > $o] :
          ( ? [X6: b] : ( X5 @ X6 )
         => ( X5 @ ( X4 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b > $o] :
        ( ! [X1: b > $o] :
          ? [X2: b] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
       => ? [X3: ( b > $o ) > b] :
          ! [X1: b > $o] : ( X0 @ X1 @ ( X3 @ X1 ) ) )
   => ? [X4: ( b > $o ) > b] :
      ! [X5: b > $o] :
        ( ? [X6: b] : ( X5 @ X6 )
       => ( X5 @ ( X4 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX5310) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: b] :
      ( ( sK0 @ @@+ @ b @ X0 )
      = $false ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: b] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ @@+ @ b @ X0 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f14,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b,X1: b] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( @@+ @ b @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: ( b > $o ) > b] :
      ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
     != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : LCL730^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 02:17:07 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.37  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26292)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26295)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26293)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26299)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26296)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26297)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (26298)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (26294)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.40  % (26294)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.40  % (26291)Success in time 0.018 s
% 0.22/0.40  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------