TSTP Solution File: LCL724^1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL724^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:53:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 23
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 53 ( 22 unt; 13 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 122 ( 15 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 22 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 266 ( 44 ~; 46 |; 12 &; 161 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 51 ( 51 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 15 ( 13 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 28 ^ 40 !; 0 ?; 68 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_24,type,
mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_27,type,
mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_39,type,
mreflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_42,type,
mtransitive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_49,type,
mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_53,type,
rel_s4: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_54,type,
mbox_s4: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_56,type,
phi: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_57,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_58,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_59,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(decl_60,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
thf(mimplies,axiom,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ X7 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mimplies) ).
thf(mnot,axiom,
( mnot
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
~ ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mnot) ).
thf(mor,axiom,
( mor
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X6 @ X3 )
| ( X7 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mor) ).
thf(mvalid,axiom,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mvalid) ).
thf(mbox_s4,axiom,
( mbox_s4
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
! [X14: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X3 @ X14 )
| ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^5.ax',mbox_s4) ).
thf(mreflexive,axiom,
( mreflexive
= ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X15: $i] : ( X13 @ X15 @ X15 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mreflexive) ).
thf(mtransitive,axiom,
( mtransitive
= ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X15: $i,X16: $i,X17: $i] :
( ( ( X13 @ X15 @ X16 )
& ( X13 @ X16 @ X17 ) )
=> ( X13 @ X15 @ X17 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mtransitive) ).
thf(conj,conjecture,
( ( mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_s4 @ phi ) @ phi ) )
& ( mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_s4 @ phi ) @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( mbox_s4 @ phi ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).
thf(a1,axiom,
mreflexive @ rel_s4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^5.ax',a1) ).
thf(a2,axiom,
mtransitive @ rel_s4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^5.ax',a2) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
( mbox_s4
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
! [X14: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ Z1 @ X14 )
| ( Z0 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox_s4]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
( mreflexive
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X15: $i] : ( Z0 @ X15 @ X15 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mreflexive]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
( mtransitive
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X15: $i,X16: $i,X17: $i] :
( ( ( Z0 @ X15 @ X16 )
& ( Z0 @ X16 @ X17 ) )
=> ( Z0 @ X15 @ X17 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mtransitive]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X27: $i] :
( ~ ! [X26: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X27 @ X26 )
| ( phi @ X26 ) )
| ( phi @ X27 ) )
& ! [X31: $i] :
( ~ ! [X28: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X31 @ X28 )
| ( phi @ X28 ) )
| ! [X30: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X31 @ X30 )
| ! [X29: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X30 @ X29 )
| ( phi @ X29 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X22: $i] : ( rel_s4 @ X22 @ X22 ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[a1,c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X23: $i,X24: $i,X25: $i] :
( ( ( rel_s4 @ X23 @ X24 )
& ( rel_s4 @ X24 @ X25 ) )
=> ( rel_s4 @ X23 @ X25 ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[a2,c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
! [X37: $i,X39: $i] :
( ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X39 )
| ( phi @ X39 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk1_0 @ X37 )
| ( phi @ X37 ) )
& ( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk1_0 @ X37 )
| ( phi @ X37 ) )
& ( ( rel_s4 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk1_0 @ X37 )
| ( phi @ X37 ) )
& ( ~ ( phi @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk1_0 @ X37 )
| ( phi @ X37 ) )
& ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X39 )
| ( phi @ X39 )
| ~ ( phi @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( phi @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_s4 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( phi @ esk1_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( phi @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( phi @ esk1_0 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_22,plain,
! [X32: $i] : ( rel_s4 @ X32 @ X32 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_23,plain,
! [X33: $i,X34: $i,X35: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X33 @ X34 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ X34 @ X35 )
| ( rel_s4 @ X33 @ X35 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( rel_s4 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( phi @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk1_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_25,plain,
! [X3: $i] : ( rel_s4 @ X3 @ X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_s4 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( phi @ esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ( phi @ X3 )
| ( phi @ X14 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk1_0 @ X14 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( phi @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( phi @ esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_29,plain,
! [X14: $i,X3: $i,X15: $i] :
( ( rel_s4 @ X3 @ X15 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ X3 @ X14 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ X14 @ X15 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
rel_s4 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( phi @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk1_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( phi @ esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( phi @ X3 )
| ~ ( phi @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk1_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ( phi @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( phi @ esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( phi @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_25]),c_0_28]) ).
thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( rel_s4 @ X3 @ esk4_0 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ X3 @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_25]),c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ ( phi @ esk4_0 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_25]),c_0_34]) ).
thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]),c_0_38]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : LCL724^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Mon May 20 01:59:07 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting almost_fo_3_lam with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 15530 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.40 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # new_ho_10 with pid 15533 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.40 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.40 # Parsed axioms : 72
% 0.14/0.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Initial clauses : 46
% 0.14/0.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 36
% 0.14/0.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.14/0.40 # Processed clauses : 31
% 0.14/0.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.14/0.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 30
% 0.14/0.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.14/0.40 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.14/0.40 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.14/0.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.14/0.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.14/0.40 # Paramodulations : 18
% 0.14/0.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.14/0.40 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.14/0.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.14/0.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 0.14/0.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22
% 0.14/0.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.14/0.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 0.14/0.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.14/0.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.14/0.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.14/0.40 # Condensation attempts : 31
% 0.14/0.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2910
% 0.14/0.40 # Search garbage collected termcells : 533
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.40 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1904 pages
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.40 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.14/0.40 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.14/0.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------