TSTP Solution File: LCL715^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : LCL715^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:53:13 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   26
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  30 unt;  15 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (  34 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  318 (  66   ~;  43   |;   9   &; 195   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :  117 ( 117   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  15 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  116 (  66   ^  47   !;   3   ?; 116   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_24,type,
    mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    mequiv: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    mforall_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_38,type,
    mdia: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_45,type,
    mfunctional: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_49,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_53,type,
    epred1_0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_54,type,
    esk1_2: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(decl_55,type,
    esk2_2: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(decl_56,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(decl_57,type,
    esk4_1: $i > $i ).

thf(mand,axiom,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ ( mnot @ X7 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mand) ).

thf(mnot,axiom,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ~ ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mnot) ).

thf(mor,axiom,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ( ( X6 @ X3 )
          | ( X7 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mor) ).

thf(mimplies,axiom,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ X7 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mimplies) ).

thf(mequiv,axiom,
    ( mequiv
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mand @ ( mimplies @ X6 @ X7 ) @ ( mimplies @ X7 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mequiv) ).

thf(mdia,axiom,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mbox @ X13 @ ( mnot @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mdia) ).

thf(mbox,axiom,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ! [X14: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X13 @ X3 @ X14 )
          | ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mbox) ).

thf(mforall_prop,axiom,
    ( mforall_prop
    = ( ^ [X9: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ! [X10: $i > $o] : ( X9 @ X10 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mforall_prop) ).

thf(mfunctional,axiom,
    ( mfunctional
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i] :
        ? [X16: $i] :
          ( ( X13 @ X15 @ X16 )
          & ! [X17: $i] :
              ( ( X13 @ X15 @ X17 )
             => ( X16 = X17 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mfunctional) ).

thf(mvalid,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mvalid) ).

thf(conj,conjecture,
    ! [X13: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( mvalid
        @ ( mforall_prop
          @ ^ [X18: $i > $o] : ( mequiv @ ( mdia @ X13 @ X18 ) @ ( mbox @ X13 @ X18 ) ) ) )
     => ( mfunctional @ X13 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
            | ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mand]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
          ~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( mequiv
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
                | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) )
            | ~ ( ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 )
                | ( Z0 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mequiv]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
            | ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ! [X22: $i] :
              ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X22 )
              | ~ ( Z1 @ X22 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mdia]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
        ! [X14: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X14 )
          | ( Z1 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( mequiv
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
                | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) )
            | ~ ( ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 )
                | ( Z0 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( mforall_prop
    = ( ^ [Z0: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
        ! [X10: $i > $o] : ( Z0 @ X10 @ Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mforall_prop]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ! [X22: $i] :
              ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X22 )
              | ~ ( Z1 @ X22 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_12]),c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( mfunctional
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i] :
        ? [X16: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X15 @ X16 )
          & ! [X17: $i] :
              ( ( Z0 @ X15 @ X17 )
             => ( X16 = X17 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mfunctional]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X13: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ! [X26: $i,X25: $i > $o] :
            ~ ( ~ ( ~ ~ ! [X23: $i] :
                          ( ~ ( X13 @ X26 @ X23 )
                          | ~ ( X25 @ X23 ) )
                  | ! [X24: $i] :
                      ( ~ ( X13 @ X26 @ X24 )
                      | ( X25 @ X24 ) ) )
              | ~ ( ~ ! [X24: $i] :
                        ( ~ ( X13 @ X26 @ X24 )
                        | ( X25 @ X24 ) )
                  | ~ ! [X23: $i] :
                        ( ~ ( X13 @ X26 @ X23 )
                        | ~ ( X25 @ X23 ) ) ) )
       => ! [X27: $i] :
          ? [X28: $i] :
            ( ( X13 @ X27 @ X28 )
            & ! [X29: $i] :
                ( ( X13 @ X27 @ X29 )
               => ( X28 = X29 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_19]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X31: $i,X32: $i > $o,X33: $i,X34: $i,X38: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X31 @ X33 )
        | ~ ( X32 @ X33 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X31 @ X34 )
        | ( X32 @ X34 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ X31 @ ( esk2_2 @ X31 @ X32 ) )
        | ( epred1_0 @ X31 @ ( esk1_2 @ X31 @ X32 ) ) )
      & ( ( X32 @ ( esk2_2 @ X31 @ X32 ) )
        | ( epred1_0 @ X31 @ ( esk1_2 @ X31 @ X32 ) ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ X31 @ ( esk2_2 @ X31 @ X32 ) )
        | ~ ( X32 @ ( esk1_2 @ X31 @ X32 ) ) )
      & ( ( X32 @ ( esk2_2 @ X31 @ X32 ) )
        | ~ ( X32 @ ( esk1_2 @ X31 @ X32 ) ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk4_1 @ X38 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ X38 ) )
      & ( ( X38
         != ( esk4_1 @ X38 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ X38 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X14: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i > $o,X15: $i] :
      ( ( X4 @ X15 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 @ X14 )
      | ~ ( X4 @ X14 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 @ X15 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i > $o] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( X4 @ ( esk1_2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i,X4: $i > $o] :
      ( ( X4 @ ( esk2_2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ( epred1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X14: $i,X15: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( X3 = X14 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X15 @ X14 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X15 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_27]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( epred1_0 @ X3
      @ ( esk2_2 @ X3
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : $true ) ),
    inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( epred1_0 @ X3
      @ ( esk1_2 @ X3
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) ),
    inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk4_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X14: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( X3
        = ( esk2_2 @ X14
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : $true ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X14 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X14: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( X3
        = ( esk1_2 @ X14
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X14 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0
    @ ( esk4_1
      @ ( esk2_2 @ esk3_0
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( esk2_2 @ X3
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : $true )
      = ( esk1_2 @ X3
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( X3
       != ( esk4_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk4_1
      @ ( esk1_2 @ esk3_0
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) )
    = ( esk1_2 @ esk3_0
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).

thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_32])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.08  % Problem    : LCL715^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.0.0.
% 0.02/0.08  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.07/0.27  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.27  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.27  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.27  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 02:55:52 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.27  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.36  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.39  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.11/0.39  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHHN.
% 0.11/0.39  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 11565 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.11/0.39  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHHN.
% 0.11/0.39  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.39  # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHSMMBN
% 0.11/0.39  # partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMMBN
% 0.11/0.39  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 386s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting new_bool_3 with 242s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting new_bool_2 with 242s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting new_bool_9 with 242s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 11572 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.11/0.39  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHHN.
% 0.11/0.39  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.39  # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHSMMBN
% 0.11/0.39  # partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMMBN
% 0.11/0.39  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 386s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.39  
% 0.11/0.39  # Proof found!
% 0.11/0.39  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.39  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.39  # Parsed axioms                        : 64
% 0.11/0.39  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Initial clauses                      : 39
% 0.11/0.39  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 32
% 0.11/0.39  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.11/0.39  # Processed clauses                    : 63
% 0.11/0.39  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.11/0.39  # ...subsumed                          : 22
% 0.11/0.39  # ...remaining for further processing  : 39
% 0.11/0.39  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.11/0.39  # Generated clauses                    : 246
% 0.11/0.39  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 225
% 0.11/0.39  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Paramodulations                      : 210
% 0.11/0.39  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Total rewrite steps                  : 75
% 0.11/0.39  # ...of those cached                   : 66
% 0.11/0.39  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.39  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.39  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.39  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.39  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.39  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.39  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39  # Current number of processed clauses  : 30
% 0.11/0.39  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.11/0.39  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.39  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.39  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 22
% 0.11/0.39  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 161
% 0.11/0.39  # ...number of literals in the above   : 348
% 0.11/0.39  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.11/0.39  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 208
% 0.11/0.39  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 204
% 0.11/0.39  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 22
% 0.11/0.39  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.11/0.39  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 25
% 0.11/0.39  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.11/0.39  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.39  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7613
% 0.11/0.39  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 668
% 0.11/0.39  
% 0.11/0.39  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.39  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.39  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.39  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.11/0.39  # Maximum resident set size: 1960 pages
% 0.11/0.39  
% 0.11/0.39  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.39  # User time                : 0.042 s
% 0.11/0.39  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.11/0.39  # Total time               : 0.057 s
% 0.11/0.39  # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.11/0.39  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.11/0.39  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------