TSTP Solution File: LCL686+1.001 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:39:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 00:16:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.44 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS derived 28 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 26 clauses.
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS allocated 97631 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS spent 0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 11 :
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.44 7[0:Inp] || -> r1(u,skf5(u))*r.
% 0.18/0.44 11[0:Inp] || r1(skc7,u) -> p2(skf5(u))* p1(skf5(u)).
% 0.18/0.44 13[0:Inp] || p1(skf5(u)) p2(skf5(u))* r1(skc7,u) -> .
% 0.18/0.44 14[0:Inp] p2(u) || r1(v,u)*+ r1(skc7,v)* -> p1(u)*.
% 0.18/0.44 15[0:Inp] p1(u) || r1(v,u)*+ r1(skc7,v)* -> p2(u)*.
% 0.18/0.44 28[0:Res:7.0,15.1] p1(skf5(u)) || r1(skc7,u) -> p2(skf5(u))*.
% 0.18/0.44 37[0:MRR:28.0,11.2] || r1(skc7,u) -> p2(skf5(u))*.
% 0.18/0.44 38[0:MRR:13.1,37.1] || p1(skf5(u))* r1(skc7,u) -> .
% 0.18/0.44 45[0:Res:7.0,14.1] p2(skf5(u)) || r1(skc7,u) -> p1(skf5(u))*.
% 0.18/0.44 53[0:MRR:45.0,45.2,37.1,38.0] || r1(skc7,u)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44 54[0:UnC:53.0,7.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.44 Formulae used in the proof : main reflexivity transitivity
% 0.18/0.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------