TSTP Solution File: LCL686+1.001 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:56:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.46s 0.63s
% Output   : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 00:11:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.46/0.63  # Version:  1.3
% 0.46/0.63  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.63  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.46/0.63  fof(reflexivity,axiom,(![X]:r1(X,X)),input).
% 0.46/0.63  fof(c23,axiom,(![X14]:r1(X14,X14)),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[reflexivity])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c24,axiom,r1(X15,X15),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c23])).
% 0.46/0.63  fof(main,conjecture,(~(?[X]:(~((![Y]:(((~r1(X,Y))|(~p3(Y)))|(![X]:((~r1(Y,X))|(~p1(X))))))|(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|(~(![X]:((~r1(Y,X))|(~((((![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|$false))|(~(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|(~((p2(Y)&(~p1(Y)))|((~p2(Y))&p1(Y))))))))|(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|p3(Y))))|(![Y]:(((~r1(X,Y))|((~p1(Y))&(~p2(Y))))|(p2(Y)&p1(Y))))))))))))))),input).
% 0.46/0.63  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(~(?[X]:(~((![Y]:(((~r1(X,Y))|(~p3(Y)))|(![X]:((~r1(Y,X))|(~p1(X))))))|(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|(~(![X]:((~r1(Y,X))|(~((((![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|$false))|(~(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|(~((p2(Y)&(~p1(Y)))|((~p2(Y))&p1(Y))))))))|(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|p3(Y))))|(![Y]:(((~r1(X,Y))|((~p1(Y))&(~p2(Y))))|(p2(Y)&p1(Y)))))))))))))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[main])).
% 0.46/0.63  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~(~(?[X]:(~((![Y]:((~r1(X,Y)|~p3(Y))|(![X]:(~r1(Y,X)|~p1(X)))))|(![Y]:(~r1(X,Y)|(~(![X]:(~r1(Y,X)|(~((((![Y]:~r1(X,Y))|(~(![Y]:(~r1(X,Y)|(~((p2(Y)&~p1(Y))|(~p2(Y)&p1(Y))))))))|(![Y]:(~r1(X,Y)|p3(Y))))|(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y)|(~p1(Y)&~p2(Y)))|(p2(Y)&p1(Y)))))))))))))))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[c0])).
% 0.46/0.63  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[X]:((?[Y]:((r1(X,Y)&p3(Y))&(?[X]:(r1(Y,X)&p1(X)))))&(?[Y]:(r1(X,Y)&(![X]:(~r1(Y,X)|((((?[Y]:r1(X,Y))&(![Y]:(~r1(X,Y)|((~p2(Y)|p1(Y))&(p2(Y)|~p1(Y))))))&(?[Y]:(r1(X,Y)&~p3(Y))))&(?[Y]:((r1(X,Y)&(p1(Y)|p2(Y)))&(~p2(Y)|~p1(Y))))))))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c1])).
% 0.46/0.63  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:((?[X3]:((r1(X2,X3)&p3(X3))&(?[X4]:(r1(X3,X4)&p1(X4)))))&(?[X5]:(r1(X2,X5)&(![X6]:(~r1(X5,X6)|((((?[X7]:r1(X6,X7))&(![X8]:(~r1(X6,X8)|((~p2(X8)|p1(X8))&(p2(X8)|~p1(X8))))))&(?[X9]:(r1(X6,X9)&~p3(X9))))&(?[X10]:((r1(X6,X10)&(p1(X10)|p2(X10)))&(~p2(X10)|~p1(X10))))))))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c2])).
% 0.46/0.63  fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(![X6]:(![X8]:(((r1(skolem0001,skolem0002)&p3(skolem0002))&(r1(skolem0002,skolem0003)&p1(skolem0003)))&(r1(skolem0001,skolem0004)&(~r1(skolem0004,X6)|(((r1(X6,skolem0005(X6))&(~r1(X6,X8)|((~p2(X8)|p1(X8))&(p2(X8)|~p1(X8)))))&(r1(X6,skolem0006(X6))&~p3(skolem0006(X6))))&((r1(X6,skolem0007(X6))&(p1(skolem0007(X6))|p2(skolem0007(X6))))&(~p2(skolem0007(X6))|~p1(skolem0007(X6)))))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(((r1(skolem0001,skolem0002)&p3(skolem0002))&(r1(skolem0002,skolem0003)&p1(skolem0003)))&(r1(skolem0001,skolem0004)&(![X6]:(~r1(skolem0004,X6)|(((r1(X6,skolem0005(X6))&(![X8]:(~r1(X6,X8)|((~p2(X8)|p1(X8))&(p2(X8)|~p1(X8))))))&(r1(X6,skolem0006(X6))&~p3(skolem0006(X6))))&((r1(X6,skolem0007(X6))&(p1(skolem0007(X6))|p2(skolem0007(X6))))&(~p2(skolem0007(X6))|~p1(skolem0007(X6))))))))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c3])).])).
% 0.46/0.63  fof(c6,negated_conjecture,(![X6]:(![X8]:(((r1(skolem0001,skolem0002)&p3(skolem0002))&(r1(skolem0002,skolem0003)&p1(skolem0003)))&(r1(skolem0001,skolem0004)&((((~r1(skolem0004,X6)|r1(X6,skolem0005(X6)))&((~r1(skolem0004,X6)|(~r1(X6,X8)|(~p2(X8)|p1(X8))))&(~r1(skolem0004,X6)|(~r1(X6,X8)|(p2(X8)|~p1(X8))))))&((~r1(skolem0004,X6)|r1(X6,skolem0006(X6)))&(~r1(skolem0004,X6)|~p3(skolem0006(X6)))))&(((~r1(skolem0004,X6)|r1(X6,skolem0007(X6)))&(~r1(skolem0004,X6)|(p1(skolem0007(X6))|p2(skolem0007(X6)))))&(~r1(skolem0004,X6)|(~p2(skolem0007(X6))|~p1(skolem0007(X6)))))))))),inference(distribute,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c17,negated_conjecture,~r1(skolem0004,X21)|r1(X21,skolem0007(X21)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c6])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c37,plain,r1(skolem0004,skolem0007(skolem0004)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c17, c24])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c13,negated_conjecture,~r1(skolem0004,X20)|~r1(X20,X19)|~p2(X19)|p1(X19),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c6])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c32,plain,~r1(skolem0004,X22)|~p2(X22)|p1(X22),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c13, c24])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c44,plain,~p2(skolem0007(skolem0004))|p1(skolem0007(skolem0004)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c32, c37])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c18,negated_conjecture,~r1(skolem0004,X32)|p1(skolem0007(X32))|p2(skolem0007(X32)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c6])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c66,plain,p1(skolem0007(skolem0004))|p2(skolem0007(skolem0004)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c18, c24])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c121,plain,p1(skolem0007(skolem0004)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c66, c44])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c14,negated_conjecture,~r1(skolem0004,X27)|~r1(X27,X26)|p2(X26)|~p1(X26),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c6])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c57,plain,~r1(skolem0004,X36)|p2(X36)|~p1(X36),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c14, c24])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c74,plain,p2(skolem0007(skolem0004))|~p1(skolem0007(skolem0004)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c57, c37])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c123,plain,p2(skolem0007(skolem0004)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c74, c121])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c19,negated_conjecture,~r1(skolem0004,X35)|~p2(skolem0007(X35))|~p1(skolem0007(X35)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c6])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c122,plain,~r1(skolem0004,skolem0004)|~p2(skolem0007(skolem0004)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c121, c19])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c127,plain,~r1(skolem0004,skolem0004),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c122, c123])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(c128,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c127, c24])).
% 0.46/0.63  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  # Initial clauses    : 15
% 0.46/0.63  # Processed clauses  : 57
% 0.46/0.63  # Factors computed   : 0
% 0.46/0.63  # Resolvents computed: 104
% 0.46/0.63  # Tautologies deleted: 1
% 0.46/0.63  # Forward subsumed   : 15
% 0.46/0.63  # Backward subsumed  : 4
% 0.46/0.63  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.46/0.63  # User time          : 0.261 s
% 0.46/0.63  # System time        : 0.020 s
% 0.46/0.63  # Total time         : 0.281 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------