TSTP Solution File: LCL686+1.001 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 09:32:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.72s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 6 unt; 3 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p1(X1)
| ~ p2(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-75g61032/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
r1(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-75g61032/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( p1(esk7_1(X1))
| p2(esk7_1(X1))
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-75g61032/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( r1(X1,esk7_1(X1))
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-75g61032/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1)
| ~ p1(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-75g61032/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p1(esk7_1(X1))
| ~ p2(esk7_1(X1))
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-75g61032/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p1(X1)
| ~ p2(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X2) ),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
r1(X1,X1),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p1(esk7_1(X1))
| p2(esk7_1(X1))
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( r1(X1,esk7_1(X1))
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1)
| ~ p1(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X2) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( p1(X1)
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X1)
| ~ p2(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( p2(esk7_1(esk4_0))
| p1(esk7_1(esk4_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
r1(esk4_0,esk7_1(esk4_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( p2(X1)
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X1)
| ~ p1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
p1(esk7_1(esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p1(esk7_1(X1))
| ~ p2(esk7_1(X1))
| ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
p2(esk7_1(esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_17]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 00:11:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.72/2.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.72/2.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.72/2.44 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.72/2.44 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a
% 7.72/2.44 # and selection function SelectNegativeLiterals.
% 7.72/2.44 #
% 7.72/2.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.72/2.44
% 7.72/2.44 # Proof found!
% 7.72/2.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.72/2.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.72/2.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.72/2.44
% 7.72/2.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.72/2.44 # User time : 0.026 s
% 7.72/2.44 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.72/2.44 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 7.72/2.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.72/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------