TSTP Solution File: LCL686+1.001 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:59:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   6 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   27 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  158 (  77   ~;  61   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   7   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn;  20   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    r1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    p3: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    p1: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    p2: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk5_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    esk6_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    esk7_1: $i > $i ).

fof(main,conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
        ~ ( ! [X2] :
              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
              | ~ p3(X2)
              | ! [X1] :
                  ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                  | ~ p1(X1) ) )
          | ! [X2] :
              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
              | ~ ! [X1] :
                    ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                    | ~ ( ! [X2] :
                            ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                            | ~ $true )
                        | ~ ! [X2] :
                              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                              | ~ ( ( p2(X2)
                                    & ~ p1(X2) )
                                  | ( ~ p2(X2)
                                    & p1(X2) ) ) )
                        | ! [X2] :
                            ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                            | p3(X2) )
                        | ! [X2] :
                            ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                            | ( ~ p1(X2)
                              & ~ p2(X2) )
                            | ( p2(X2)
                              & p1(X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',main) ).

fof(reflexivity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : r1(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [X1] :
          ~ ( ! [X2] :
                ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                | ~ p3(X2)
                | ! [X1] :
                    ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                    | ~ p1(X1) ) )
            | ! [X2] :
                ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                | ~ ! [X1] :
                      ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                      | ~ ( ! [X2] : ~ r1(X1,X2)
                          | ~ ! [X2] :
                                ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                                | ~ ( ( p2(X2)
                                      & ~ p1(X2) )
                                    | ( ~ p2(X2)
                                      & p1(X2) ) ) )
                          | ! [X2] :
                              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                              | p3(X2) )
                          | ! [X2] :
                              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                              | ( ~ p1(X2)
                                & ~ p2(X2) )
                              | ( p2(X2)
                                & p1(X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[main])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X12,X14] :
      ( r1(esk1_0,esk2_0)
      & p3(esk2_0)
      & r1(esk2_0,esk3_0)
      & p1(esk3_0)
      & r1(esk1_0,esk4_0)
      & ( r1(X12,esk5_1(X12))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X12) )
      & ( ~ p2(X14)
        | p1(X14)
        | ~ r1(X12,X14)
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X12) )
      & ( p2(X14)
        | ~ p1(X14)
        | ~ r1(X12,X14)
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X12) )
      & ( r1(X12,esk6_1(X12))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X12) )
      & ( ~ p3(esk6_1(X12))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X12) )
      & ( r1(X12,esk7_1(X12))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X12) )
      & ( p1(esk7_1(X12))
        | p2(esk7_1(X12))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X12) )
      & ( ~ p2(esk7_1(X12))
        | ~ p1(esk7_1(X12))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X12) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X4] : r1(X4,X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ p2(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(X1,esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    r1(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(X1)
    | ~ p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ p2(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk7_1(esk4_0),X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ p1(esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(X1)
    | ~ p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(esk7_1(esk4_0))
    | ~ p2(esk7_1(esk4_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(esk7_1(X1))
    | p2(esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p1(esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    p1(esk7_1(esk4_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1(esk4_0,esk7_1(esk4_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13  % Problem    : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 07:20:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.59  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.61  % Total time : 0.006000 s
% 0.20/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.61  % Total time : 0.009000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------