TSTP Solution File: LCL674+1.015 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL674+1.015 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:39:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.72s 8.88s
% Output   : Refutation 8.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : LCL674+1.015 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 11:19:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 8.72/8.88  
% 8.72/8.88  SPASS V 3.9 
% 8.72/8.88  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 8.72/8.88  % SZS status Theorem
% 8.72/8.88  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 8.72/8.88  SPASS derived 3851 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3713 clauses.
% 8.72/8.88  SPASS allocated 104605 KBytes.
% 8.72/8.88  SPASS spent	0:00:08.45 on the problem.
% 8.72/8.88  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 8.72/8.88  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 8.72/8.88  		0:00:00.06 for inferences.
% 8.72/8.88  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 8.72/8.88  		0:00:07.94 for the reduction.
% 8.72/8.88  
% 8.72/8.88  
% 8.72/8.88  Here is a proof with depth 12, length 51 :
% 8.72/8.88  % SZS output start Refutation
% 8.72/8.88  1[0:Inp] ||  -> p100(skc1)*.
% 8.72/8.88  2[0:Inp] || p101(skc1)* -> .
% 8.72/8.88  3[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf58(u))*r.
% 8.72/8.88  7[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf56(u))*r.
% 8.72/8.88  9[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf54(u))*r.
% 8.72/8.88  11[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf52(u))*r.
% 8.72/8.88  13[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf50(u))*r.
% 8.72/8.88  15[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf48(u))*r.
% 8.72/8.88  34[0:Inp] || r1(skc1,u) -> p7(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  49[0:Inp] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  51[0:Inp] || r1(u,v)* r1(v,w)* -> r1(u,w)*.
% 8.72/8.88  82[0:Inp] p104(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u) p105(skf50(u))*.
% 8.72/8.88  85[0:Inp] p103(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u) p104(skf52(u))*.
% 8.72/8.88  88[0:Inp] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u) p103(skf54(u))*.
% 8.72/8.88  91[0:Inp] p101(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u) p102(skf56(u))*.
% 8.72/8.88  94[0:Inp] p100(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u) p101(skf58(u))*.
% 8.72/8.88  124[0:Inp] p105(u) || p7(skf48(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p106(u).
% 8.72/8.88  128[0:Inp] p104(u) || p106(skf50(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u).
% 8.72/8.88  131[0:Inp] p103(u) || p105(skf52(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u).
% 8.72/8.88  134[0:Inp] p102(u) || p104(skf54(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u).
% 8.72/8.88  137[0:Inp] p101(u) || p103(skf56(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u).
% 8.72/8.88  140[0:Inp] p100(u) || p102(skf58(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u).
% 8.72/8.88  358[0:Res:49.2,2.0] p102(skc1) || r1(skc1,skc1)* -> .
% 8.72/8.88  359[0:MRR:358.1,3.0] p102(skc1) ||  -> .
% 8.72/8.88  388[0:Res:34.1,124.1] p105(u) || r1(skc1,skf48(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p106(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5154[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,388.1,15.0] p105(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p106(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5155[0:Obv:5154.1] p105(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p106(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5188[0:Res:5155.2,128.1] p105(skf50(u)) p104(u) || r1(skc1,skf50(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5189[0:MRR:5188.0,82.3] p104(u) || r1(skc1,skf50(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5192[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,5189.1,13.0] p104(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5193[0:Obv:5192.1] p104(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5286[0:Res:5193.2,131.1] p104(skf52(u)) p103(u) || r1(skc1,skf52(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5287[0:MRR:5286.0,85.3] p103(u) || r1(skc1,skf52(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5382[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,5287.1,11.0] p103(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5383[0:Obv:5382.1] p103(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5476[0:Res:5383.2,134.1] p103(skf54(u)) p102(u) || r1(skc1,skf54(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5477[0:MRR:5476.0,88.3] p102(u) || r1(skc1,skf54(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5570[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,5477.1,9.0] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5571[0:Obv:5570.1] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5665[0:Res:5571.2,137.1] p102(skf56(u)) p101(u) || r1(skc1,skf56(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5666[0:MRR:5665.0,91.3] p101(u) || r1(skc1,skf56(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5763[0:Res:7.0,5666.1] p101(skc1) || r1(skc1,skc1) -> p102(skc1)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5764[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,5666.1,7.0] p101(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5765[0:MRR:5763.1,5763.2,3.0,359.0] p101(skc1) ||  -> .
% 8.72/8.88  5766[0:Obv:5764.1] p101(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5860[0:Res:5766.2,140.1] p101(skf58(u)) p100(u) || r1(skc1,skf58(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5861[0:MRR:5860.0,94.3] p100(u) || r1(skc1,skf58(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u).
% 8.72/8.88  5953[0:Res:5.0,5861.1] p100(skc1) || r1(skc1,skc1) -> p101(skc1)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5955[0:SSi:5953.0,1.0] || r1(skc1,skc1) -> p101(skc1)*.
% 8.72/8.88  5956[0:MRR:5955.0,5955.1,3.0,5765.0] ||  -> .
% 8.72/8.88  % SZS output end Refutation
% 8.72/8.88  Formulae used in the proof : main reflexivity transitivity
% 8.72/8.88  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------