TSTP Solution File: LCL672+1.001 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : LCL672+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 09:38:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 215.25s 166.46s
% Output   : Proof 216.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : LCL672+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 01:20:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.57/0.61          ____       _                          
% 0.57/0.61    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.57/0.61   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.57/0.61  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.57/0.61  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.57/0.61  
% 0.57/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.57/0.62  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.57/0.62  
% 0.57/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.57/0.62  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.57/0.62  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.57/0.62  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.57/0.62  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.57/0.62  
% 0.57/0.62  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.57/0.62  
% 0.57/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.67/0.69  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.52/1.00  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.85/1.10  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.85/1.12  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.00/5.98  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 17.22/6.02  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 17.68/6.15  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 27.74/8.58  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 28.02/8.61  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 28.02/8.68  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 28.02/8.68  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 38.00/11.59  Prover 0: stopped
% 38.62/11.79  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 38.62/11.81  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 38.62/11.81  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 38.62/11.82  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 83.41/53.12  Prover 3: stopped
% 83.67/53.33  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 83.67/53.36  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 84.08/53.43  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 84.08/53.43  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 135.96/100.86  Prover 1: stopped
% 136.10/101.06  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 136.21/101.09  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 136.44/101.13  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 147.30/110.24  Prover 5: stopped
% 147.56/110.44  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 147.56/110.47  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 147.56/110.51  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 147.56/110.51  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 165.31/126.94  Prover 2: stopped
% 165.54/127.14  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 165.54/127.16  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 165.54/127.18  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 214.50/166.05  Prover 4: stopped
% 214.77/166.25  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 214.85/166.28  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 214.85/166.31  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 215.25/166.45  Prover 8: proved (200ms)
% 215.25/166.45  Prover 6: stopped
% 215.25/166.46  Prover 7: stopped
% 215.25/166.46  
% 215.25/166.46  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 215.25/166.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 215.25/166.46  
% 215.25/166.46  Generating proof ... found it (size 103)
% 216.27/166.76  
% 216.27/166.76  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 216.27/166.76  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 216.27/166.76  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (r1(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (r1(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (r1(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v1) |  ~ (p1(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (p2(v2) = v1) |  ~ (p2(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (r1(v0, v0) = v1)) &  ? [v0] : ( ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p1(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0) &  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p2(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0) &  ? [v1] : (r1(v0, v1) = 0 &  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & p1(v2) = v3 & r1(v1, v2) = 0) &  ? [v2] : (r1(v1, v2) = 0 &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & r1(v2, v3) = v5)))) & ( ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)) |  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p2(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)) | ( ! [v1] : ( ~ (p1(v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v2) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (p1(v3) = 0 & r1(v2, v3) = 0))) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : r1(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & p1(v3) = v4 & r1(v2, v3) = 0)) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (r1(v2, v3) = 0 &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & r1(v3, v4) = v6))))) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & r1(v2, v3) = v5)) |  ! [v3] : ( ~ (r1(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & p1(v4) = v5 & r1(v3, v4) = 0)))))))
% 216.27/166.79  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 216.27/166.79  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (r1(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (r1(v3, v2) = v0))
% 216.27/166.79  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v1) |  ~ (p1(v2) = v0))
% 216.27/166.79  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (r1(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4))
% 216.27/166.79  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (p2(v2) = v1) |  ~ (p2(v2) = v0))
% 216.27/166.79  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (r1(v0, v0) = v1))
% 216.27/166.79  | (6)  ? [v0] : ( ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p1(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0) &  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p2(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0) &  ? [v1] : (r1(v0, v1) = 0 &  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & p1(v2) = v3 & r1(v1, v2) = 0) &  ? [v2] : (r1(v1, v2) = 0 &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & r1(v2, v3) = v5)))) & ( ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)) |  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p2(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)) | ( ! [v1] : ( ~ (p1(v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v2) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (p1(v3) = 0 & r1(v2, v3) = 0))) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : r1(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & p1(v3) = v4 & r1(v2, v3) = 0)) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (r1(v2, v3) = 0 &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & r1(v3, v4) = v6))))) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & r1(v2, v3) = v5)) |  ! [v3] : ( ~ (r1(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & p1(v4) = v5 & r1(v3, v4) = 0)))))))
% 216.27/166.80  |
% 216.27/166.80  | Instantiating (6) with all_1_0_0 yields:
% 216.27/166.80  | (7)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & p1(v0) = v1 & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & p2(v0) = v1 & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] : (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0 &  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p1(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0) &  ? [v1] : (r1(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4)))) & ( ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v2)) |  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p2(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v2)) | ( ! [v0] : ( ~ (p1(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v1) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (p1(v2) = 0 & r1(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : r1(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & p1(v2) = v3 & r1(v1, v2) = 0)) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (r1(v1, v2) = 0 &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & r1(v2, v3) = v5))))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4)) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & p1(v3) = v4 & r1(v2, v3) = 0))))))
% 216.57/166.81  |
% 216.57/166.81  | Applying alpha-rule on (7) yields:
% 216.57/166.81  | (8)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & p1(v0) = v1 & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0)
% 216.57/166.81  | (9)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & p2(v0) = v1 & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0)
% 216.57/166.81  | (10)  ? [v0] : (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0 &  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p1(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0) &  ? [v1] : (r1(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4))))
% 216.57/166.81  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v2)) |  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p2(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v2)) | ( ! [v0] : ( ~ (p1(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v1) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (p1(v2) = 0 & r1(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : r1(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & p1(v2) = v3 & r1(v1, v2) = 0)) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (r1(v1, v2) = 0 &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & r1(v2, v3) = v5))))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4)) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & p1(v3) = v4 & r1(v2, v3) = 0)))))
% 216.57/166.81  |
% 216.57/166.81  | Instantiating (10) with all_2_0_1 yields:
% 216.57/166.81  | (12) r1(all_1_0_0, all_2_0_1) = 0 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & p1(v0) = v1 & r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] : (r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Applying alpha-rule on (12) yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (13) r1(all_1_0_0, all_2_0_1) = 0
% 216.57/166.82  | (14)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & p1(v0) = v1 & r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0)
% 216.57/166.82  | (15)  ? [v0] : (r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Instantiating (9) with all_4_0_2, all_4_1_3 yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (16)  ~ (all_4_0_2 = 0) & p2(all_4_1_3) = all_4_0_2 & r1(all_1_0_0, all_4_1_3) = 0
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Applying alpha-rule on (16) yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (17)  ~ (all_4_0_2 = 0)
% 216.57/166.82  | (18) p2(all_4_1_3) = all_4_0_2
% 216.57/166.82  | (19) r1(all_1_0_0, all_4_1_3) = 0
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Instantiating (8) with all_6_0_4, all_6_1_5 yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (20)  ~ (all_6_0_4 = 0) & p1(all_6_1_5) = all_6_0_4 & r1(all_1_0_0, all_6_1_5) = 0
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Applying alpha-rule on (20) yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (21)  ~ (all_6_0_4 = 0)
% 216.57/166.82  | (22) p1(all_6_1_5) = all_6_0_4
% 216.57/166.82  | (23) r1(all_1_0_0, all_6_1_5) = 0
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Instantiating (15) with all_8_0_6 yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (24) r1(all_2_0_1, all_8_0_6) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_8_0_6, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Applying alpha-rule on (24) yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (25) r1(all_2_0_1, all_8_0_6) = 0
% 216.57/166.82  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_8_0_6, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Instantiating (14) with all_11_0_7, all_11_1_8 yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (27)  ~ (all_11_0_7 = 0) & p1(all_11_1_8) = all_11_0_7 & r1(all_2_0_1, all_11_1_8) = 0
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Applying alpha-rule on (27) yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (28)  ~ (all_11_0_7 = 0)
% 216.57/166.82  | (29) p1(all_11_1_8) = all_11_0_7
% 216.57/166.82  | (30) r1(all_2_0_1, all_11_1_8) = 0
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Instantiating formula (26) with all_11_0_7, all_11_1_8 and discharging atoms p1(all_11_1_8) = all_11_0_7, yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (31) all_11_0_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_8_0_6, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  | Instantiating formula (26) with all_6_0_4, all_6_1_5 and discharging atoms p1(all_6_1_5) = all_6_0_4, yields:
% 216.57/166.82  | (32) all_6_0_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_8_0_6, all_6_1_5) = v0)
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (11), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.82  |-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.82  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v2)) |  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p2(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.82  |
% 216.57/166.82  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (33), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.82  	|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.82  	| (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.82  	|
% 216.57/166.82  		| Instantiating formula (34) with all_6_0_4, all_6_1_5 and discharging atoms p1(all_6_1_5) = all_6_0_4, yields:
% 216.57/166.82  		| (35) all_6_0_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, all_6_1_5) = v0)
% 216.57/166.82  		|
% 216.57/166.82  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (32), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.82  		|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.82  		| (36) all_6_0_4 = 0
% 216.57/166.82  		|
% 216.57/166.82  			| Equations (36) can reduce 21 to:
% 216.57/166.82  			| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.82  			|
% 216.57/166.82  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.82  		|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.82  		| (21)  ~ (all_6_0_4 = 0)
% 216.57/166.82  		| (39)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_8_0_6, all_6_1_5) = v0)
% 216.57/166.82  		|
% 216.57/166.82  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (35), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.82  			|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.82  			| (36) all_6_0_4 = 0
% 216.57/166.82  			|
% 216.57/166.82  				| Equations (36) can reduce 21 to:
% 216.57/166.82  				| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.82  				|
% 216.57/166.82  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.82  			|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.82  			| (21)  ~ (all_6_0_4 = 0)
% 216.57/166.83  			| (43)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, all_6_1_5) = v0)
% 216.57/166.83  			|
% 216.57/166.83  				| Instantiating (43) with all_30_0_10 yields:
% 216.57/166.83  				| (44)  ~ (all_30_0_10 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, all_6_1_5) = all_30_0_10
% 216.57/166.83  				|
% 216.57/166.83  				| Applying alpha-rule on (44) yields:
% 216.57/166.83  				| (45)  ~ (all_30_0_10 = 0)
% 216.57/166.83  				| (46) r1(all_1_0_0, all_6_1_5) = all_30_0_10
% 216.57/166.83  				|
% 216.57/166.83  				| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_6_1_5, all_30_0_10, 0 and discharging atoms r1(all_1_0_0, all_6_1_5) = all_30_0_10, r1(all_1_0_0, all_6_1_5) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.83  				| (47) all_30_0_10 = 0
% 216.57/166.83  				|
% 216.57/166.83  				| Equations (47) can reduce 45 to:
% 216.57/166.83  				| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.83  				|
% 216.57/166.83  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.83  	|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.83  	| (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p2(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.83  	|
% 216.57/166.83  		| Instantiating formula (49) with all_4_0_2, all_4_1_3 and discharging atoms p2(all_4_1_3) = all_4_0_2, yields:
% 216.57/166.83  		| (50) all_4_0_2 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, all_4_1_3) = v0)
% 216.57/166.83  		|
% 216.57/166.83  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (50), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.83  		|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.83  		| (51) all_4_0_2 = 0
% 216.57/166.83  		|
% 216.57/166.83  			| Equations (51) can reduce 17 to:
% 216.57/166.83  			| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.83  			|
% 216.57/166.83  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.83  		|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.83  		| (17)  ~ (all_4_0_2 = 0)
% 216.57/166.83  		| (54)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, all_4_1_3) = v0)
% 216.57/166.83  		|
% 216.57/166.83  			| Instantiating (54) with all_30_0_14 yields:
% 216.57/166.83  			| (55)  ~ (all_30_0_14 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, all_4_1_3) = all_30_0_14
% 216.57/166.83  			|
% 216.57/166.83  			| Applying alpha-rule on (55) yields:
% 216.57/166.83  			| (56)  ~ (all_30_0_14 = 0)
% 216.57/166.83  			| (57) r1(all_1_0_0, all_4_1_3) = all_30_0_14
% 216.57/166.83  			|
% 216.57/166.83  			| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_4_1_3, all_30_0_14, 0 and discharging atoms r1(all_1_0_0, all_4_1_3) = all_30_0_14, r1(all_1_0_0, all_4_1_3) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.83  			| (58) all_30_0_14 = 0
% 216.57/166.83  			|
% 216.57/166.83  			| Equations (58) can reduce 56 to:
% 216.57/166.83  			| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.83  			|
% 216.57/166.83  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.83  |-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.83  | (60)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (p1(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v1) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (p1(v2) = 0 & r1(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : r1(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & p1(v2) = v3 & r1(v1, v2) = 0)) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (r1(v1, v2) = 0 &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & r1(v2, v3) = v5))))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4)) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & p1(v3) = v4 & r1(v2, v3) = 0))))
% 216.57/166.83  |
% 216.57/166.83  	| Applying alpha-rule on (60) yields:
% 216.57/166.83  	| (61)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (p1(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = v1) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (p1(v2) = 0 & r1(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 216.57/166.83  	| (62)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : r1(v0, v1) = 0)
% 216.57/166.83  	| (63)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & p1(v2) = v3 & r1(v1, v2) = 0)) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : (r1(v1, v2) = 0 &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & r1(v2, v3) = v5)))))
% 216.57/166.83  	| (64)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_1_0_0, v0) = 0) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4)) |  ! [v2] : ( ~ (r1(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & p1(v3) = v4 & r1(v2, v3) = 0))))
% 216.57/166.83  	|
% 216.57/166.84  	| Instantiating formula (62) with all_2_0_1 and discharging atoms r1(all_1_0_0, all_2_0_1) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.84  	| (65)  ? [v0] : r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0
% 216.57/166.84  	|
% 216.57/166.84  	| Instantiating formula (63) with all_2_0_1 and discharging atoms r1(all_1_0_0, all_2_0_1) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.84  	| (66)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p1(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0)) |  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (r1(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4))))
% 216.57/166.84  	|
% 216.57/166.84  	| Instantiating formula (64) with all_2_0_1 and discharging atoms r1(all_1_0_0, all_2_0_1) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.84  	| (67)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0) |  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)) |  ! [v1] : ( ~ (r1(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & p1(v2) = v3 & r1(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 216.57/166.84  	|
% 216.57/166.84  	| Instantiating formula (67) with all_11_1_8 and discharging atoms r1(all_2_0_1, all_11_1_8) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.84  	| (68)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_11_1_8, v0) = v2)) |  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_11_1_8, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p1(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0))
% 216.57/166.84  	|
% 216.57/166.84  	| Instantiating (65) with all_27_0_18 yields:
% 216.57/166.84  	| (69) r1(all_2_0_1, all_27_0_18) = 0
% 216.57/166.84  	|
% 216.57/166.84  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (31), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.84  	|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.84  	| (70) all_11_0_7 = 0
% 216.57/166.84  	|
% 216.57/166.84  		| Equations (70) can reduce 28 to:
% 216.57/166.84  		| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.84  		|
% 216.57/166.84  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.84  	|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.84  	| (28)  ~ (all_11_0_7 = 0)
% 216.57/166.84  	| (73)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_8_0_6, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.84  	|
% 216.57/166.84  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (66), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.84  		|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.84  		| (74)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p1(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0))
% 216.57/166.84  		|
% 216.57/166.84  			| Instantiating formula (74) with all_8_0_6 and discharging atoms r1(all_2_0_1, all_8_0_6) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.84  			| (75)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & p1(v0) = v1 & r1(all_8_0_6, v0) = 0)
% 216.57/166.84  			|
% 216.57/166.84  			| Instantiating (75) with all_47_0_21, all_47_1_22 yields:
% 216.57/166.84  			| (76)  ~ (all_47_0_21 = 0) & p1(all_47_1_22) = all_47_0_21 & r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_1_22) = 0
% 216.57/166.84  			|
% 216.57/166.84  			| Applying alpha-rule on (76) yields:
% 216.57/166.84  			| (77)  ~ (all_47_0_21 = 0)
% 216.57/166.84  			| (78) p1(all_47_1_22) = all_47_0_21
% 216.57/166.84  			| (79) r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_1_22) = 0
% 216.57/166.84  			|
% 216.57/166.84  			| Instantiating formula (26) with all_47_0_21, all_47_1_22 and discharging atoms p1(all_47_1_22) = all_47_0_21, yields:
% 216.57/166.84  			| (80) all_47_0_21 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_1_22) = v0)
% 216.57/166.84  			|
% 216.57/166.84  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (80), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.84  			|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.84  			| (81) all_47_0_21 = 0
% 216.57/166.84  			|
% 216.57/166.84  				| Equations (81) can reduce 77 to:
% 216.57/166.84  				| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.84  				|
% 216.57/166.84  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.84  			|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.84  			| (77)  ~ (all_47_0_21 = 0)
% 216.57/166.84  			| (84)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_1_22) = v0)
% 216.57/166.84  			|
% 216.57/166.84  				| Instantiating (84) with all_66_0_29 yields:
% 216.57/166.84  				| (85)  ~ (all_66_0_29 = 0) & r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_1_22) = all_66_0_29
% 216.57/166.84  				|
% 216.57/166.84  				| Applying alpha-rule on (85) yields:
% 216.57/166.84  				| (86)  ~ (all_66_0_29 = 0)
% 216.57/166.84  				| (87) r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_1_22) = all_66_0_29
% 216.57/166.84  				|
% 216.57/166.84  				| Instantiating formula (1) with all_8_0_6, all_47_1_22, all_66_0_29, 0 and discharging atoms r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_1_22) = all_66_0_29, r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_1_22) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.84  				| (88) all_66_0_29 = 0
% 216.57/166.84  				|
% 216.57/166.84  				| Equations (88) can reduce 86 to:
% 216.57/166.84  				| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.84  				|
% 216.57/166.84  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.84  		|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.84  		| (90)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_2_0_1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (r1(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & r1(v1, v2) = v4))))
% 216.57/166.84  		|
% 216.57/166.84  			| Instantiating formula (90) with all_27_0_18 and discharging atoms r1(all_2_0_1, all_27_0_18) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.84  			| (91)  ? [v0] : (r1(all_27_0_18, v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Instantiating formula (90) with all_11_1_8 and discharging atoms r1(all_2_0_1, all_11_1_8) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (92)  ? [v0] : (r1(all_11_1_8, v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Instantiating formula (90) with all_8_0_6 and discharging atoms r1(all_2_0_1, all_8_0_6) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (93)  ? [v0] : (r1(all_8_0_6, v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & r1(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Instantiating (93) with all_47_0_34 yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (94) r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_0_34) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_47_0_34, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Applying alpha-rule on (94) yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (95) r1(all_8_0_6, all_47_0_34) = 0
% 216.57/166.85  			| (96)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_47_0_34, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Instantiating formula (96) with all_11_0_7, all_11_1_8 and discharging atoms p1(all_11_1_8) = all_11_0_7, yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (97) all_11_0_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_47_0_34, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Instantiating (92) with all_50_0_35 yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (98) r1(all_11_1_8, all_50_0_35) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_50_0_35, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Applying alpha-rule on (98) yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (99) r1(all_11_1_8, all_50_0_35) = 0
% 216.57/166.85  			| (100)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_50_0_35, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Instantiating formula (100) with all_11_0_7, all_11_1_8 and discharging atoms p1(all_11_1_8) = all_11_0_7, yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (101) all_11_0_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_50_0_35, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Instantiating (91) with all_53_0_36 yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (102) r1(all_27_0_18, all_53_0_36) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_53_0_36, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Applying alpha-rule on (102) yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (103) r1(all_27_0_18, all_53_0_36) = 0
% 216.57/166.85  			| (104)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_53_0_36, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			| Instantiating formula (104) with all_11_0_7, all_11_1_8 and discharging atoms p1(all_11_1_8) = all_11_0_7, yields:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (105) all_11_0_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_53_0_36, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (97), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.85  			|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (70) all_11_0_7 = 0
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  				| Equations (70) can reduce 28 to:
% 216.57/166.85  				| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.85  				|
% 216.57/166.85  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.85  			|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.85  			| (28)  ~ (all_11_0_7 = 0)
% 216.57/166.85  			| (109)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_47_0_34, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.85  			|
% 216.57/166.85  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (101), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.85  				|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.85  				| (70) all_11_0_7 = 0
% 216.57/166.85  				|
% 216.57/166.85  					| Equations (70) can reduce 28 to:
% 216.57/166.85  					| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.85  					|
% 216.57/166.85  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.85  				|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.85  				| (28)  ~ (all_11_0_7 = 0)
% 216.57/166.85  				| (113)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_50_0_35, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.85  				|
% 216.57/166.85  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (105), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.85  					|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.85  					| (70) all_11_0_7 = 0
% 216.57/166.85  					|
% 216.57/166.85  						| Equations (70) can reduce 28 to:
% 216.57/166.85  						| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.85  						|
% 216.57/166.85  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.85  					|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.85  					| (28)  ~ (all_11_0_7 = 0)
% 216.57/166.85  					| (117)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_53_0_36, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.85  					|
% 216.57/166.85  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (68), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.85  						|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.85  						| (118)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p1(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & r1(all_11_1_8, v0) = v2))
% 216.57/166.85  						|
% 216.57/166.85  							| Instantiating formula (118) with all_11_0_7, all_11_1_8 and discharging atoms p1(all_11_1_8) = all_11_0_7, yields:
% 216.57/166.85  							| (119) all_11_0_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_11_1_8, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.86  							|
% 216.57/166.86  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (119), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.86  							|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.86  							| (70) all_11_0_7 = 0
% 216.57/166.86  							|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Equations (70) can reduce 28 to:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.86  							|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.86  							| (28)  ~ (all_11_0_7 = 0)
% 216.57/166.86  							| (123)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_11_1_8, all_11_1_8) = v0)
% 216.57/166.86  							|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Instantiating (123) with all_167_0_77 yields:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (124)  ~ (all_167_0_77 = 0) & r1(all_11_1_8, all_11_1_8) = all_167_0_77
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Applying alpha-rule on (124) yields:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (125)  ~ (all_167_0_77 = 0)
% 216.57/166.86  								| (126) r1(all_11_1_8, all_11_1_8) = all_167_0_77
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Instantiating formula (5) with all_167_0_77, all_11_1_8 and discharging atoms r1(all_11_1_8, all_11_1_8) = all_167_0_77, yields:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (127) all_167_0_77 = 0
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Equations (127) can reduce 125 to:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.86  						|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.86  						| (129)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (r1(all_11_1_8, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p1(v1) = v2 & r1(v0, v1) = 0))
% 216.57/166.86  						|
% 216.57/166.86  							| Instantiating formula (129) with all_50_0_35 and discharging atoms r1(all_11_1_8, all_50_0_35) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.86  							| (130)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & p1(v0) = v1 & r1(all_50_0_35, v0) = 0)
% 216.57/166.86  							|
% 216.57/166.86  							| Instantiating (130) with all_133_0_81, all_133_1_82 yields:
% 216.57/166.86  							| (131)  ~ (all_133_0_81 = 0) & p1(all_133_1_82) = all_133_0_81 & r1(all_50_0_35, all_133_1_82) = 0
% 216.57/166.86  							|
% 216.57/166.86  							| Applying alpha-rule on (131) yields:
% 216.57/166.86  							| (132)  ~ (all_133_0_81 = 0)
% 216.57/166.86  							| (133) p1(all_133_1_82) = all_133_0_81
% 216.57/166.86  							| (134) r1(all_50_0_35, all_133_1_82) = 0
% 216.57/166.86  							|
% 216.57/166.86  							| Instantiating formula (100) with all_133_0_81, all_133_1_82 and discharging atoms p1(all_133_1_82) = all_133_0_81, yields:
% 216.57/166.86  							| (135) all_133_0_81 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_50_0_35, all_133_1_82) = v0)
% 216.57/166.86  							|
% 216.57/166.86  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (135), into two cases.
% 216.57/166.86  							|-Branch one:
% 216.57/166.86  							| (136) all_133_0_81 = 0
% 216.57/166.86  							|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Equations (136) can reduce 132 to:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.86  							|-Branch two:
% 216.57/166.86  							| (132)  ~ (all_133_0_81 = 0)
% 216.57/166.86  							| (139)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & r1(all_50_0_35, all_133_1_82) = v0)
% 216.57/166.86  							|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Instantiating (139) with all_181_0_112 yields:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (140)  ~ (all_181_0_112 = 0) & r1(all_50_0_35, all_133_1_82) = all_181_0_112
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Applying alpha-rule on (140) yields:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (141)  ~ (all_181_0_112 = 0)
% 216.57/166.86  								| (142) r1(all_50_0_35, all_133_1_82) = all_181_0_112
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Instantiating formula (1) with all_50_0_35, all_133_1_82, all_181_0_112, 0 and discharging atoms r1(all_50_0_35, all_133_1_82) = all_181_0_112, r1(all_50_0_35, all_133_1_82) = 0, yields:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (143) all_181_0_112 = 0
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								| Equations (143) can reduce 141 to:
% 216.57/166.86  								| (37) $false
% 216.57/166.86  								|
% 216.57/166.86  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 216.57/166.86  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 216.57/166.86  
% 216.57/166.86  166231ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------