TSTP Solution File: LCL666+1.001 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : LCL666+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 07:47:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.45s 0.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   81 (  42   ~;  22   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0 sgn;  11   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : r1(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

fof(f2,conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] :
        ~ ( ~ ( p101(X0)
              & p201(X0) )
          | ~ ! [X1] :
                ( ~ ( p101(X1)
                    & p201(X1) )
                | ~ r1(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',main) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [X0] :
          ~ ( ~ ( p101(X0)
                & p201(X0) )
            | ~ ! [X1] :
                  ( ~ ( p101(X1)
                      & p201(X1) )
                  | ~ r1(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ~ ( ~ ( p101(X0)
            & p201(X0) )
        | ~ ! [X1] :
              ( ~ ( p101(X1)
                  & p201(X1) )
              | ~ r1(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( p101(X0)
      & p201(X0)
      & ! [X1] :
          ( ~ p101(X1)
          | ~ p201(X1)
          | ~ r1(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( p101(X0)
      & p201(X0)
      & ! [X1] :
          ( ~ p101(X1)
          | ~ p201(X1)
          | ~ r1(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( p101(X0)
        & p201(X0)
        & ! [X1] :
            ( ~ p101(X1)
            | ~ p201(X1)
            | ~ r1(X0,X1) ) )
   => ( p101(sK0)
      & p201(sK0)
      & ! [X1] :
          ( ~ p101(X1)
          | ~ p201(X1)
          | ~ r1(sK0,X1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( p101(sK0)
    & p201(sK0)
    & ! [X1] :
        ( ~ p101(X1)
        | ~ p201(X1)
        | ~ r1(sK0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0] : r1(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ p101(X1)
      | ~ p201(X1)
      | ~ r1(sK0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    p201(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    p101(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    r1(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    p101(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    p201(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1(sK0,X0)
    | ~ p101(X0)
    | ~ p201(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    r1(sK0,sK0),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ( ~ r1(sK0,sK0)
    | ~ p101(sK0)
    | ~ p201(sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_53,c_50,c_51]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem  : LCL666+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 07:10:27 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.35  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.45/0.97  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/0.97  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/0.97  
% 0.45/0.97  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.45/0.97  
% 0.45/0.97  ------  iProver source info
% 0.45/0.97  
% 0.45/0.97  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.45/0.97  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.45/0.97  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.45/0.97  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.45/0.97  
% 0.45/0.97  ------ Parsing...
% 0.45/0.97  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 0.45/0.97  
% 0.45/0.97  
% 0.45/0.97  ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.45/0.97  
% 0.45/0.97  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/0.97  
% 0.45/0.97  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.45/0.97  
% 0.45/0.97  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------