TSTP Solution File: LCL666+1.001 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : LCL666+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:56:20 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : LCL666+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 22:19:22 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.47  # Version:  1.3
% 0.18/0.47  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.18/0.47  fof(main,conjecture,(~(?[X]:(~((~(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|(~(p201(Y)&p101(Y))))))|(~(p201(X)&p101(X))))))),input).
% 0.18/0.47  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(~(?[X]:(~((~(![Y]:((~r1(X,Y))|(~(p201(Y)&p101(Y))))))|(~(p201(X)&p101(X)))))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[main])).
% 0.18/0.47  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~(~(?[X]:(~((~(![Y]:(~r1(X,Y)|(~(p201(Y)&p101(Y))))))|(~(p201(X)&p101(X)))))))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[c0])).
% 0.18/0.47  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[X]:((![Y]:(~r1(X,Y)|(~p201(Y)|~p101(Y))))&(p201(X)&p101(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c1])).
% 0.18/0.47  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:((![X3]:(~r1(X2,X3)|(~p201(X3)|~p101(X3))))&(p201(X2)&p101(X2)))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c2])).
% 0.18/0.47  fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(![X3]:((~r1(skolem0001,X3)|(~p201(X3)|~p101(X3)))&(p201(skolem0001)&p101(skolem0001)))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c4,negated_conjecture,((![X3]:(~r1(skolem0001,X3)|(~p201(X3)|~p101(X3))))&(p201(skolem0001)&p101(skolem0001))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c3])).])).
% 0.18/0.47  cnf(c7,negated_conjecture,p201(skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.18/0.47  cnf(c8,negated_conjecture,p101(skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.18/0.47  fof(reflexivity,axiom,(![X]:r1(X,X)),input).
% 0.18/0.47  fof(c9,axiom,(![X4]:r1(X4,X4)),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[reflexivity])).
% 0.18/0.47  cnf(c10,axiom,r1(X5,X5),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c9])).
% 0.18/0.47  cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,~r1(skolem0001,X6)|~p201(X6)|~p101(X6),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.18/0.47  cnf(c11,plain,~p201(skolem0001)|~p101(skolem0001),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c6, c10])).
% 0.18/0.47  cnf(c12,plain,~p201(skolem0001),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c11, c8])).
% 0.18/0.47  cnf(c13,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c12, c7])).
% 0.18/0.47  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # Initial clauses    : 4
% 0.18/0.47  # Processed clauses  : 6
% 0.18/0.47  # Factors computed   : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Resolvents computed: 3
% 0.18/0.47  # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Backward subsumed  : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.18/0.47  # User time          : 0.130 s
% 0.18/0.47  # System time        : 0.015 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Total time         : 0.145 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------