TSTP Solution File: LCL664+1.001 by Bliksem---1.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem : LCL664+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : bliksem %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 07:56:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.69s 1.09s
% Output : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL664+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : bliksem %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 08:24:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.69/1.09 *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.69/1.09 *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.69/1.09 *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.69/1.09 Bliksem 1.12
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Clauses:
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 { r1( X, X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { ! r1( skol1, X ), p16( X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { ! r1( skol1, X ), p12( X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { ! r1( skol1, X ), p14( X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { ! r1( skol1, X ), p12( X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { r1( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { ! p15( skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { r1( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { ! p13( skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { r1( skol1, skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { ! p12( skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { r1( skol1, skol5 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 { ! p11( skol5 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 percentage equality = 0.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.69/1.09 This is a near-Horn, non-equality problem
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Options Used:
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 useres = 1
% 0.69/1.09 useparamod = 0
% 0.69/1.09 useeqrefl = 0
% 0.69/1.09 useeqfact = 0
% 0.69/1.09 usefactor = 1
% 0.69/1.09 usesimpsplitting = 0
% 0.69/1.09 usesimpdemod = 0
% 0.69/1.09 usesimpres = 4
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 resimpinuse = 1000
% 0.69/1.09 resimpclauses = 20000
% 0.69/1.09 substype = standard
% 0.69/1.09 backwardsubs = 1
% 0.69/1.09 selectoldest = 5
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 litorderings [0] = split
% 0.69/1.09 litorderings [1] = liftord
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 termordering = none
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 litapriori = 1
% 0.69/1.09 termapriori = 0
% 0.69/1.09 litaposteriori = 0
% 0.69/1.09 termaposteriori = 0
% 0.69/1.09 demodaposteriori = 0
% 0.69/1.09 ordereqreflfact = 0
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 litselect = negative
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 maxweight = 30000
% 0.69/1.09 maxdepth = 30000
% 0.69/1.09 maxlength = 115
% 0.69/1.09 maxnrvars = 195
% 0.69/1.09 excuselevel = 0
% 0.69/1.09 increasemaxweight = 0
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 maxselected = 10000000
% 0.69/1.09 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 showgenerated = 0
% 0.69/1.09 showkept = 0
% 0.69/1.09 showselected = 0
% 0.69/1.09 showdeleted = 0
% 0.69/1.09 showresimp = 1
% 0.69/1.09 showstatus = 2000
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 prologoutput = 0
% 0.69/1.09 nrgoals = 5000000
% 0.69/1.09 totalproof = 1
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 {} [0, 0] (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 . [1, 2] (w:1, o:24, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 ! [4, 1] (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 = [13, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 ==> [14, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 r1 [36, 2] (w:1, o:48, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 p16 [38, 1] (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 p12 [39, 1] (w:1, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 p14 [40, 1] (w:1, o:23, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 p15 [41, 1] (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 p13 [42, 1] (w:1, o:22, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 p11 [43, 1] (w:1, o:20, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 skol1 [44, 0] (w:1, o:8, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 skol2 [45, 0] (w:1, o:9, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 skol3 [46, 0] (w:1, o:10, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 skol4 [47, 0] (w:1, o:11, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.69/1.09 skol5 [48, 0] (w:1, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Starting Search:
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.69/1.09 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.69/1.09 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 (2) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M1} I { p12( X ), ! r1( skol1, X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (8) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { r1( skol1, skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (9) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! p12( skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (15) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} R(2,8);r(9) { }.
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.69/1.09 found a proof!
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 (17) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V1,M1} { r1( X, X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (18) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M2} { ! r1( skol1, X ), p16( X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (19) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M2} { ! r1( skol1, X ), p12( X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (20) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M2} { ! r1( skol1, X ), p14( X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (21) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M2} { ! r1( skol1, X ), p12( X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (22) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { r1( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (23) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { ! p15( skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (24) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { r1( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (25) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { ! p13( skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (26) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { r1( skol1, skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (27) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { ! p12( skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (28) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { r1( skol1, skol5 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 (29) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { ! p11( skol5 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Total Proof:
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 subsumption: (2) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M1} I { p12( X ), ! r1( skol1, X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 parent0: (19) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M2} { ! r1( skol1, X ), p12( X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 substitution0:
% 0.69/1.09 X := X
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09 permutation0:
% 0.69/1.09 0 ==> 1
% 0.69/1.09 1 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 subsumption: (8) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { r1( skol1, skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 parent0: (26) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { r1( skol1, skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 substitution0:
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09 permutation0:
% 0.69/1.09 0 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 subsumption: (9) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! p12( skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 parent0: (27) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} { ! p12( skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 substitution0:
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09 permutation0:
% 0.69/1.09 0 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 resolution: (30) {G1,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} { p12( skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 parent0[1]: (2) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V1,M1} I { p12( X ), ! r1( skol1, X ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 parent1[0]: (8) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { r1( skol1, skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 substitution0:
% 0.69/1.09 X := skol4
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09 substitution1:
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 resolution: (31) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} { }.
% 0.69/1.09 parent0[0]: (9) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! p12( skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 parent1[0]: (30) {G1,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} { p12( skol4 ) }.
% 0.69/1.09 substitution0:
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09 substitution1:
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 subsumption: (15) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} R(2,8);r(9) { }.
% 0.69/1.09 parent0: (31) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} { }.
% 0.69/1.09 substitution0:
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09 permutation0:
% 0.69/1.09 end
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Proof check complete!
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Memory use:
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 space for terms: 226
% 0.69/1.09 space for clauses: 732
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 clauses generated: 17
% 0.69/1.09 clauses kept: 16
% 0.69/1.09 clauses selected: 11
% 0.69/1.09 clauses deleted: 0
% 0.69/1.09 clauses inuse deleted: 0
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 subsentry: 1
% 0.69/1.09 literals s-matched: 1
% 0.69/1.09 literals matched: 1
% 0.69/1.09 full subsumption: 0
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 checksum: -1833732
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09
% 0.69/1.09 Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------