TSTP Solution File: LCL657+1.001 by Z3---4.8.9.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem : LCL657+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 18 04:57:30 EDT 2022
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.20s 0.42s
% Output : Model 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : LCL657+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Sep 1 23:21:03 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.13/0.36 Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.13/0.36 -h, -? prints this message.
% 0.13/0.36 -smt2 print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.13/0.36 -m, -model generate model.
% 0.13/0.36 -p, -proof generate proof.
% 0.13/0.36 -c, -core generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.13/0.36 -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.13/0.36 -t:timeout set timeout (in second).
% 0.13/0.36 -smt2status display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.13/0.36 -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.13/0.36 -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.13/0.36 -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.20/0.42 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.20/0.42 % SZS output start Model
% 0.20/0.42 tff(p102_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.42 p102: $i > $o)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(tptp_fun__i_val_2_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.42 tptp_fun__i_val_2: $i)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(tptp_fun__i_val_1_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.42 tptp_fun__i_val_1: $i)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(tptp_fun__i_val_0_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.42 tptp_fun__i_val_0: $i)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(p101_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.42 p101: $i > $o)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(p100_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.42 p100: $i > $o)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(p2_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.42 p2: $i > $o)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(r1_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.42 r1: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(p1_type, type, (
% 0.20/0.42 p1: $i > $o)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(formula1, axiom,
% 0.20/0.42 ![X0: $i] : (p102(X0) <=> $false)).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(formula2, axiom,
% 0.20/0.42 ![X0: $i] : (p101(X0) <=> ((ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1) | (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2)))).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(formula3, axiom,
% 0.20/0.42 ![X0: $i] : (p100(X0) <=> ((ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) | (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) | (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1)))).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(formula4, axiom,
% 0.20/0.42 ![X0: $i] : (p2(X0) <=> (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2))).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(formula5, axiom,
% 0.20/0.42 ![X0: $i, X1: $i] : (r1(X0, X1) <=> (((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1)) | ((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!1)) | ((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0)) | ((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!0) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2)) | ((ite_t((X1 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X1 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2) & (ite_t((X0 = $i!val!0), $i!val!0, ite_t((X0 = $i!val!2), $i!val!2, $i!val!1)) = $i!val!2))))).
% 0.20/0.42 tff(formula6, axiom,
% 0.20/0.42 ![X0: $i] : (p1(X0) <=> $false)).
% 0.20/0.42 % SZS output end Model
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------