TSTP Solution File: LCL657+1.001 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : LCL657+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:29:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_3)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X2)
    | ~ r1(X1,X2)
    | ~ p100(X2)
    | ~ p1(X1)
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | p101(X1)
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | p101(X1)
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(X1,X2)
    | ~ p1(X2)
    | ~ p100(X2)
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(esk3_1(X1))
    | p101(X1)
    | ~ p1(X1)
    | ~ p100(esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(esk2_1(X1))
    | p101(X1)
    | ~ p1(X1)
    | ~ p100(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | p101(X1)
    | ~ p1(esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ p100(esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | p101(X1)
    | ~ p1(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ p100(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(X1)
    | ~ r1(X1,X2)
    | ~ p2(X2)
    | ~ p101(X2)
    | ~ p101(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(X2)
    | ~ r1(X1,X2)
    | ~ p101(X2)
    | ~ p2(X1)
    | ~ p101(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( p101(esk3_1(X1))
    | p101(X1)
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( p101(esk2_1(X1))
    | p101(X1)
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( p101(X1)
    | ~ p102(esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( p101(X1)
    | ~ p102(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( p101(X1)
    | ~ p2(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(esk3_1(X1))
    | p101(X1)
    | ~ p100(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( p100(X1)
    | ~ p101(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( p101(X1)
    | ~ p102(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p101(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    r1(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    p100(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem    : LCL657+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 12:55:35 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eqhtLn1SNl/E---3.1_13024.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # new_bool_1 with pid 13104 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13109 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # No proof found!
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48  # Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses                      : 17
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 17
% 0.19/0.48  # Processed clauses                    : 38
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...remaining for further processing  : 38
% 0.19/0.48  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Generated clauses                    : 14
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.19/0.48  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Paramodulations                      : 14
% 0.19/0.48  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.19/0.48  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 18
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.19/0.48  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42
% 0.19/0.48  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.19/0.48  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation attempts                : 38
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2001
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.19/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------