TSTP Solution File: LCL656+1.005 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LCL656+1.005 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 09:29:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.09s 2.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 14 unt; 6 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 104 ( 0 equ; 67 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_1(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(X3,X2)
| ~ r1(X4,X3)
| ~ r1(X5,X4)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
r1(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(X3,X2)
| ~ r1(X4,X3)
| ~ r1(X5,X4)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_31,plain,
( p101(X1)
| r1(X1,esk10_1(X1))
| ~ p100(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_31) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
p100(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p101(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
( p101(X1)
| p101(esk10_1(X1))
| ~ p100(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
( p101(X1)
| ~ p100(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1)
| ~ p102(esk10_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_39,plain,
( p102(X1)
| r1(X1,esk8_1(X1))
| ~ p101(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_39) ).
cnf(i_0_38,plain,
( p102(X1)
| ~ p101(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1)
| ~ p3(esk8_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4ps071dy/input.p',i_0_38) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_1(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(X3,X2)
| ~ r1(X4,X3)
| ~ r1(X5,X4)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X5) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
r1(X1,X1),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( epred1_1(X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X2)
| ~ r1(X2,X3)
| ~ r1(X3,X4)
| ~ r1(X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( epred1_1(X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X2)
| ~ r1(X2,X3)
| ~ r1(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( epred1_1(X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X2)
| ~ r1(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( epred1_1(X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(X3,X2)
| ~ r1(X4,X3)
| ~ r1(X5,X4)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X5) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( p101(X1)
| r1(X1,esk10_1(X1))
| ~ p100(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
i_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
epred1_1(esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
p100(esk1_0),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
~ p101(esk1_0),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( p3(X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X2)
| ~ r1(X2,X3)
| ~ r1(X3,X4)
| ~ r1(X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
r1(esk1_0,esk10_1(esk1_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59])]),c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( p101(X1)
| p101(esk10_1(X1))
| ~ p100(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( p101(X1)
| ~ p100(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1)
| ~ p102(esk10_1(X1)) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( p3(X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X2)
| ~ r1(X2,X3)
| ~ r1(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( p102(X1)
| r1(X1,esk8_1(X1))
| ~ p101(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
i_0_39 ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
epred1_1(esk10_1(esk1_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_62]),c_0_51])]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
p101(esk10_1(esk1_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_58]),c_0_59])]),c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
~ p102(esk10_1(esk1_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_58]),c_0_59])]),c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
( p102(X1)
| ~ p101(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1)
| ~ p3(esk8_1(X1)) ),
i_0_38 ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( p3(X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X2)
| ~ r1(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
r1(esk10_1(esk1_0),esk8_1(esk10_1(esk1_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]),c_0_68])]),c_0_69]) ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
~ p3(esk8_1(esk10_1(esk1_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_67]),c_0_68])]),c_0_69]) ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]),c_0_62])]),c_0_73]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL656+1.005 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 18:57:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.09/2.49 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.09/2.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.09/2.49 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.09/2.49 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C12_11_nc_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I
% 8.09/2.49 # and selection function SelectCQArEqLast.
% 8.09/2.49 #
% 8.09/2.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 8.09/2.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.09/2.49
% 8.09/2.49 # Proof found!
% 8.09/2.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.09/2.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.09/2.49 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.09/2.49
% 8.09/2.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.09/2.49 # User time : 0.038 s
% 8.09/2.49 # System time : 0.006 s
% 8.09/2.49 # Total time : 0.044 s
% 8.09/2.49 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.09/2.49
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------