TSTP Solution File: LCL656+1.001 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : LCL656+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:48:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.75s 1.02s
% Output : Refutation 0.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL656+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 07:32:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.75/1.02 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.75/1.02 Process 24499 was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.75/1.02 Sun Jul 3 07:32:41 2022
% 0.75/1.02 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_24345_n025.cluster.edu".
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_24345_n025.cluster.edu
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.75/1.02 set(auto2).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.75/1.02 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.75/1.02 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.75/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.75/1.02 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.75/1.02 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.75/1.02 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.75/1.02 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.75/1.02 clear(print_given).
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (2 formulas)
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.75/1.02 1 (all X r1(X,X)) # label(reflexivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.75/1.02 2 --(exists X -(-(all Y (-r1(X,Y) | p2(Y))) | -((all Y (-r1(X,Y) | (-(all X (-r1(Y,X) | -(-p2(X) & -p102(X) & p101(X)))) & -(all X (-r1(Y,X) | -(p2(X) & -p102(X) & p101(X)))) | -(-p101(Y) & p100(Y))) & (((all X (-r1(Y,X) | -p2(X) | -p101(X))) | p2(Y)) & ((all X (-r1(Y,X) | p2(X) | -p101(X))) | -p2(Y)) | -p101(Y)) & (((all X (-r1(Y,X) | -p1(X) | -p100(X))) | p1(Y)) & ((all X (-r1(Y,X) | p1(X) | -p100(X))) | -p1(Y)) | -p100(Y)) & (p101(Y) | -p102(Y)) & (p100(Y) | -p101(Y)))) & -p101(X) & p100(X)))) # label(main) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.75/1.02 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. f1=1. f2=1.
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.75/1.02 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.75/1.02 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.75/1.02 % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.75/1.02 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.75/1.02 % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.75/1.02 % Given clauses 16.
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 1 (all X r1(X,X)) # label(reflexivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.75/1.02 2 --(exists X -(-(all Y (-r1(X,Y) | p2(Y))) | -((all Y (-r1(X,Y) | (-(all X (-r1(Y,X) | -(-p2(X) & -p102(X) & p101(X)))) & -(all X (-r1(Y,X) | -(p2(X) & -p102(X) & p101(X)))) | -(-p101(Y) & p100(Y))) & (((all X (-r1(Y,X) | -p2(X) | -p101(X))) | p2(Y)) & ((all X (-r1(Y,X) | p2(X) | -p101(X))) | -p2(Y)) | -p101(Y)) & (((all X (-r1(Y,X) | -p1(X) | -p100(X))) | p1(Y)) & ((all X (-r1(Y,X) | p1(X) | -p100(X))) | -p1(Y)) | -p100(Y)) & (p101(Y) | -p102(Y)) & (p100(Y) | -p101(Y)))) & -p101(X) & p100(X)))) # label(main) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.75/1.02 3 p100(c1) # label(main) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(2)].
% 0.75/1.02 4 r1(A,A) # label(reflexivity) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)].
% 0.75/1.02 5 -p101(c1) # label(main) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(2)].
% 0.75/1.02 6 -r1(c1,A) | p2(A) # label(main) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(2)].
% 0.75/1.02 8 -r1(c1,A) | -p2(f1(A)) | p101(A) | -p100(A) # label(main) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(2)].
% 0.75/1.02 12 -r1(c1,A) | r1(A,f1(A)) | p101(A) | -p100(A) # label(main) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(2)].
% 0.75/1.02 18 -p2(f1(c1)). [resolve(8,a,4,a),unit_del(b,5),unit_del(c,3)].
% 0.75/1.02 22 r1(c1,f1(c1)). [resolve(12,a,4,a),unit_del(b,5),unit_del(c,3)].
% 0.75/1.02 26 $F. [ur(6,b,18,a),unit_del(a,22)].
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 Given=16. Generated=37. Kept=23. proofs=1.
% 0.75/1.02 Usable=16. Sos=7. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=18. Hints=0.
% 0.75/1.02 Megabytes=0.08.
% 0.75/1.02 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.75/1.02 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.75/1.02
% 0.75/1.02 Process 24499 exit (max_proofs) Sun Jul 3 07:32:41 2022
% 0.75/1.02 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------