TSTP Solution File: LCL654+1.001 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL654+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:31:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : LCL654+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 06:41:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34  The process was started by sandbox on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34  Sun Jul  3 06:41:15 2022
% 0.12/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 21950.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.34  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.34  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 53
% 0.18/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 57
% 0.18/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 92
% 0.18/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.18/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.18/0.39     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.18/0.39     distinct function count: 5
% 0.18/0.39     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.18/0.76  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.39 sec ----> 1258 [binary,1257.1,10.1] {-} $F.
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  Length of proof is 9.  Level of proof is 9.
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.18/0.76  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  3 [] {+} -r1($c4,A)| -r1(A,B)| -r1(B,C)|r1(C,$f2(A,B,C))| -r1(B,D)|p1(D).
% 0.18/0.76  4 [] {+} -r1($c4,A)| -r1(A,B)| -r1(B,C)| -p1($f2(A,B,C))| -r1(B,D)|p1(D).
% 0.18/0.76  5 [] {+} -r1($c4,A)| -r1(A,B)|r1(B,$f3(A,B))| -r1(A,C)|r1(C,$f4(A,C)).
% 0.18/0.76  6 [] {+} -r1($c4,A)| -r1(A,B)|r1(B,$f3(A,B))| -r1(A,C)| -p1($f4(A,C)).
% 0.18/0.76  7 [] {+} -r1($c4,A)| -r1(A,B)| -r1($f3(A,B),C)|p1(C)| -r1(A,D)|r1(D,$f4(A,D)).
% 0.18/0.76  8 [] {+} -r1($c4,A)| -r1(A,B)| -r1($f3(A,B),C)|p1(C)| -r1(A,D)| -p1($f4(A,D)).
% 0.18/0.76  10 [] {+} -p1($c1).
% 0.18/0.76  11 [] {+} -r1($c3,A)|p1(A).
% 0.18/0.76  54 [] {+} r1(A,A).
% 0.18/0.76  55 [] {+} r1($c4,$c3).
% 0.18/0.76  56 [] {+} r1($c3,$c2).
% 0.18/0.76  57 [] {-} r1($c2,$c1).
% 0.18/0.76  79 [hyper,55,5,56,54] {+} r1($c2,$f3($c3,$c2))|r1($c3,$f4($c3,$c3)).
% 0.18/0.76  404 [hyper,79,11] {+} r1($c2,$f3($c3,$c2))|p1($f4($c3,$c3)).
% 0.18/0.76  471 [hyper,404,6,55,56,54,factor_simp] {+} r1($c2,$f3($c3,$c2)).
% 0.18/0.76  474 [hyper,471,3,55,56,57,unit_del,10] {-} r1($f3($c3,$c2),$f2($c3,$c2,$f3($c3,$c2))).
% 0.18/0.76  484 [hyper,474,7,55,56,54] {+} p1($f2($c3,$c2,$f3($c3,$c2)))|r1($c3,$f4($c3,$c3)).
% 0.18/0.76  1211 [hyper,484,4,55,56,471,57,unit_del,10] {+} r1($c3,$f4($c3,$c3)).
% 0.18/0.76  1218 [hyper,1211,11] {+} p1($f4($c3,$c3)).
% 0.18/0.76  1248 [hyper,1218,8,55,56,474,54] {-} p1($f2($c3,$c2,$f3($c3,$c2))).
% 0.18/0.76  1257 [hyper,1248,4,55,56,471,57] {-} p1($c1).
% 0.18/0.76  1258 [binary,1257.1,10.1] {-} $F.
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.76  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  ============ end of search ============
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  true clauses given         126      (94.0%)
% 0.18/0.76  false clauses given          8
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.18/0.76     4  0         1
% 0.18/0.76     5  0         1
% 0.18/0.76     6  0         6
% 0.18/0.76     9  0         6
% 0.18/0.76    12  0         4
% 0.18/0.76    13  0         14
% 0.18/0.76    14  0         28
% 0.18/0.76    15  0         21
% 0.18/0.76    16  0         21
% 0.18/0.76    17  0         19
% 0.18/0.76    18  0         22
% 0.18/0.76    19  0         16
% 0.18/0.76    20  0         11
% 0.18/0.76    21  0         7
% 0.18/0.76    22  0         11
% 0.18/0.76    23  0         5
% 0.18/0.76    24  0         6
% 0.18/0.76    25  0         3
% 0.18/0.76    26  0         7
% 0.18/0.76    27  0         7
% 0.18/0.76    28  0         9
% 0.18/0.76    29  0         3
% 0.18/0.76    30  0         3
% 0.18/0.76    31  0         2
% 0.18/0.76    32  0         2
% 0.18/0.76    33  0         1
% 0.18/0.76  tot:  0         236      (100.0% true)
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.18/0.76  
% 0.18/0.76  Process 21950 finished Sun Jul  3 06:41:15 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------