TSTP Solution File: LCL649+1.005 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL649+1.005 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:48:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 12.53s 3.87s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : LCL649+1.005 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:37:34 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 12.53/3.86  
% 12.53/3.87  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.53/3.87  
% 12.53/3.87  Inference rules
% 12.53/3.87  ----------------------
% 12.53/3.87  #Ref     : 0
% 12.53/3.87  #Sup     : 3460
% 12.53/3.87  #Fact    : 0
% 12.53/3.87  #Define  : 0
% 12.53/3.87  #Split   : 52
% 12.53/3.87  #Chain   : 0
% 12.53/3.87  #Close   : 0
% 12.53/3.87  
% 12.53/3.87  Ordering : KBO
% 12.53/3.87  
% 12.53/3.87  Simplification rules
% 12.53/3.87  ----------------------
% 12.53/3.87  #Subsume      : 2189
% 12.53/3.87  #Demod        : 219
% 12.53/3.87  #Tautology    : 10
% 12.53/3.87  #SimpNegUnit  : 9
% 12.53/3.87  #BackRed      : 0
% 12.53/3.87  
% 12.53/3.87  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 12.53/3.87  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 12.53/3.87  
% 12.53/3.87  Timing (in seconds)
% 12.53/3.87  ----------------------
% 12.53/3.87  Preprocessing        : 0.66
% 12.53/3.87  Parsing              : 0.34
% 12.53/3.87  CNF conversion       : 0.07
% 12.53/3.87  Main loop            : 2.17
% 12.53/3.87  Inferencing          : 0.58
% 12.53/3.87  Reduction            : 0.53
% 12.53/3.87  Demodulation         : 0.39
% 12.53/3.87  BG Simplification    : 0.09
% 12.53/3.87  Subsumption          : 0.50
% 12.53/3.87  Abstraction          : 0.07
% 12.53/3.87  MUC search           : 0.00
% 12.53/3.87  Cooper               : 0.00
% 12.53/3.87  Total                : 2.85
% 12.53/3.87  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 12.53/3.87  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 12.53/3.87  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 12.53/3.87  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------