TSTP Solution File: LCL649+1.001 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL649+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:48:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 2.47s 1.57s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL649+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:53:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.47/1.57  
% 2.47/1.57  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.47/1.57  
% 2.47/1.57  Inference rules
% 2.47/1.57  ----------------------
% 2.47/1.57  #Ref     : 0
% 2.47/1.57  #Sup     : 1
% 2.47/1.57  #Fact    : 0
% 2.47/1.57  #Define  : 0
% 2.47/1.57  #Split   : 0
% 2.47/1.57  #Chain   : 0
% 2.47/1.57  #Close   : 0
% 2.47/1.57  
% 2.47/1.57  Ordering : KBO
% 2.47/1.57  
% 2.47/1.57  Simplification rules
% 2.47/1.57  ----------------------
% 2.47/1.57  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.47/1.57  #Demod        : 2
% 2.47/1.57  #Tautology    : 1
% 2.47/1.57  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.47/1.57  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.47/1.57  
% 2.47/1.57  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.47/1.57  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.47/1.57  
% 2.47/1.57  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.47/1.57  ----------------------
% 2.47/1.57  Preprocessing        : 0.39
% 2.47/1.57  Parsing              : 0.22
% 2.47/1.57  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.47/1.57  Main loop            : 0.14
% 2.47/1.57  Inferencing          : 0.07
% 2.47/1.57  Reduction            : 0.02
% 2.47/1.58  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 2.47/1.58  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.47/1.58  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 2.47/1.58  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.47/1.58  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.47/1.58  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.47/1.58  Total                : 0.54
% 2.47/1.58  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.47/1.58  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.47/1.58  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.47/1.58  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------