TSTP Solution File: LCL646+1.001 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL646+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:27:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 86 ( 40 ~; 35 |; 11 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn; 20 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(main,conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
~ ( ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p6(X2) )
| ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p2(X2) )
| ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p4(X2) )
| ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p2(X2) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p5(X2) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p3(X2) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p2(X2) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p1(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uAaDd9k0KA/E---3.1_29786.p',main) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ? [X1] :
~ ( ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p6(X2) )
| ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p2(X2) )
| ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p4(X2) )
| ~ ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p2(X2) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p5(X2) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p3(X2) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p2(X2) )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X1,X2)
| p1(X2) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[main])]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ r1(esk1_0,X4)
| p6(X4) )
& ( ~ r1(esk1_0,X5)
| p2(X5) )
& ( ~ r1(esk1_0,X6)
| p4(X6) )
& ( ~ r1(esk1_0,X7)
| p2(X7) )
& r1(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& ~ p5(esk2_0)
& r1(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& ~ p3(esk3_0)
& r1(esk1_0,esk4_0)
& ~ p2(esk4_0)
& r1(esk1_0,esk5_0)
& ~ p1(esk5_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
r1(esk1_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ r1(esk1_0,esk4_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : LCL646+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:28:01 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uAaDd9k0KA/E---3.1_29786.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 29872 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 29877 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 12
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 23
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 520
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------